[justshutupandtakeit]

Hyperbolic red herrings never add much to a substantive conversation. Our nation is under attack by a deadly enemy and must be protected from its attacks. You got a problem with that? Or did 9/11 never happen?

[Jhoffa_]

Hyperbolic red herrings never add much to a substantive conversation. Our nation is under attack by a deadly enemy and must be protected from its attacks. You got a problem with that? Or did 9/11 never happen?

1) Re-read your post.

2) As I stated before, from here it looks to me like the only bunch running and hiding like little girls are the people willing to comprimise anything and everything so fedgov can maken them feel "safe"

Ben Franklin spoke about these people, and what he said wasn't very nice.

[jeremiah]

We are under attack We are no more safer because of the new laws/rules, and we are in no more danger than we were before 9/11. The enemy is within, get rid of him. Deport all visitors, allow them back in with stringent security checks. With fewer people to investigate, the job would be much easier for our security people. It is just simple logic. Until illegals, and all non-citizens are removed, every other move is just window dressing.

[PuNcH]

Our nation is under attack by a deadly enemy and must be protected from its attacks. You got a problem with that? Or did 9/11 never happen?

And so then we were going to do what about illegal immigration? Amnesty? Your position is in contradiction. Maybe you should actually read the article.

[Axenolith]

Our nation is under attack by a deadly enemy and must be protected from its attacks. You got a problem with that? Or did 9/11 never happen?

Then WHY aren't the guys running the show BUTCHERING our FREAKIN' ENEMIES!!!