Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

I'd like to know just how many citizens are aware of the implications contained in this business. (‡>[
1 posted on 06/11/2002 11:07:01 PM PDT by Pistol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


SUPPORT FREE REPUBLIC

Donate Here By Secure Server

Or mail checks to
FreeRepublic , LLC
PO BOX 9771
FRESNO, CA 93794

or you can use

PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com

2 posted on 06/11/2002 11:07:51 PM PDT by Mo1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pistol
Letter to Charlton Heston regarding and defending our individual rights

A Call to Arms is not Sufficient

We only have the rights we defend, as long as we are able.

3 posted on 06/11/2002 11:26:36 PM PDT by First_Salute
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pistol
Tyranny of Good Intentions : How Prosecutors and Bureaucrats Are Trampling the Constitution in the Name of Justice, by Paul Craig Roberts and , Lawrence M. Stratton.
4 posted on 06/11/2002 11:31:39 PM PDT by First_Salute
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pistol

5 posted on 06/11/2002 11:32:39 PM PDT by First_Salute
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: M Kehoe;PhiKapMom;joanie-f;brityank;snopercod;redrock;mommadooo3
Bump.
6 posted on 06/11/2002 11:33:49 PM PDT by First_Salute
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pistol
A few key points.

>>>The law originated in a strategy by the National Rifle Association and the Bush administration to forestall further anti-gun legislation by emphasizing tougher enforcement of existing gun laws.
>>>Once they run out of serious gun crimes, they push on with technical and meritless indictments.
>>>No one should be surprised when many of those prosecuted in the name of Safe Neighborhoods are hapless gun owners who are no threat to society.

Upon initial review, this seemed like a reasonable law to enact. Now it appears, this law has gone over the line of reason and may be inflicting some seriously, excessive actions and burdens, on basically innocent people. I think a reevaluation by the Bush administartion, is in order.

8 posted on 06/11/2002 11:35:38 PM PDT by Reagan Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pistol
"Another consequence, which might not have been unintended, is jury-shopping by prosecutors. Black juries resist prosecutors' efforts to convict based on expansive interpretations of laws and meritless charges. In contrast, white juries believe the prosecutor." (NewsMax)

B.S. As a lawyer - who both defended and prosecuted criminals for a decade, mostly in the 1990s - I can tell you that black jurors don't hesitate to convict criminals, black or otherwise.

The only "exceptions" are cases like O.J. where the guy has become an obvious "symbol of blackness." But even then, did being tried in the heavily-black Atlanta area get H. Rap Brown acquitted of shooting two officers this past year?

Racial jury nullification by black jurors may be happening in a couple of Sharptonized northeastern cities - but, to whatever extent it is, it's not much; state prisons are full of black inmates convicted largely by urban juries!

Scandals of antigun politicians, activists, and lawyers

10 posted on 06/11/2002 11:41:48 PM PDT by glc1173@aol.com
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pistol
The ATF has been at this long before this ever came along. ATF agents don't like working in inner cities when they can work in the 'burbs near home. If there isn't sufficient gun-related crime available in your 'burban neighborhood to justify your existence there, manufacture some at the nearest gun dealer so you don't get transferred to some armpit inner city. Too bad you can't buy stock in the government criminal-injustice-system because it's a sure-fire growth industry. Oh, wait a minute, maybe I could buy stock in those private prison companies (sigh)
13 posted on 06/12/2002 12:32:44 AM PDT by agitator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pistol
Yep, they want to replace the pistol with a bunch of bureaucrats. Guess which one can sin and which one cannot sin? Bureaucratic technology is EVIL EVIL EVIL.
14 posted on 06/12/2002 1:13:29 AM PDT by lavaroise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pistol
whaddya know? the next stupid bill Bush will sign..
15 posted on 06/12/2002 2:18:29 AM PDT by wafflehouse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pistol
bump...bump...bump
Free Republic is a bump in the slippery slope
16 posted on 06/12/2002 5:12:48 AM PDT by Maelstrom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pistol;*bang_list

Many of the local and state groups formed independently of the NRA have warned about this for some time.

On the National Level Gunowners of America, Jews for the Preservation of Firearms Ownership, Citizens of America, Right to Keep And Bear Arms etc. have also questioned this approach.

For whatever reason the NRA has more of an "inside the beltway" mentality than a pro 2nd Amendment, pro Constitution mentality.

As with so many other things, real Americans need to regain control of the NRA.

Best regards,

21 posted on 06/12/2002 6:13:38 AM PDT by Copernicus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: madfly
fyi
22 posted on 06/12/2002 8:54:38 AM PDT by Free the USA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pistol
From the article: 'Healy advises President Bush to abandon Project Safe Neighborhoods, because it is an "affront to the Constitution and the rule of law." No one should be surprised when many of those prosecuted in the name of Safe Neighborhoods are hapless gun owners who are no threat to society. '

The affront to the Constitution was the passing of this unConstitutional garbage by Congress and Presidents who signed the laws. The only way to rid ourselves of these onerous laws is to prosecute them until the Supreme Court is forced to rule. Selective prosecution is a dangerous power to grant to the government and should be avoided. If the law is on the books, then prosecute.

25 posted on 06/12/2002 10:35:34 AM PDT by William Tell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pistol
From the article: 'Outraged at the lack of prosecutorial judgment, he [a judge] asked: "How far is this policy of locking up people with guns going to go? Who decided this is a federal crime?" '

This is the very valuable beginning to a process which will eventually end when judges recognize the Constitution and the Bill of Rights as the law of the land. Like Judge Cummings in the Emerson case, they need to dismiss due to violation of the Second Amendment and force the appeals courts to deal with the consequences. Failure to do this duty is a great part of why we find ourselves in the present mess.

26 posted on 06/12/2002 10:39:00 AM PDT by William Tell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pistol
Gene Healy, a Cato Institute scholar, recently provided a thorough exploration of the unintended consequences of one law, the new Bush-Ashcroft plan to federalize gun crimes, known as the Project Safe Neighborhoods program.

There Goes the Neighborhood: The Bush-Ashcroft Plan to "Help" Localities Fight Gun Crime, by Gene Healy

31 posted on 06/12/2002 1:14:07 PM PDT by Sandy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pistol
Reporter David Holthouse examined 191 Colorado federal firearm cases.

David Holthouse article posted here:
Living in Exile -- Federal prisons are filling up with people whose only crime is gun possession

32 posted on 06/12/2002 1:15:02 PM PDT by Sandy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pistol
The surest way to get rid of a bad law is to enforce it rigorously.

- Abraham Lincoln

36 posted on 06/18/2002 12:46:20 PM PDT by fire_eye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson