Only if the vaccine works. And the numbers do not support the data. Quite the opposite is true. I notice that you ignore the data from London's own registry. Convenient for you but not very convincing. If vaccinations are to be considered scientifically sound, then there should be some data to support the theory that they erradicate or slow disease rates. There isn't any. Such data cannot be produced.
The polio vaccine is another fine example of propaganda not quite matching scientific data. It is a fact that there hasn't been a single case of polio in the United States since 1970 that wasn't related to exposure to the vaccine. There is data to suggest that the date can be pushed back to 1954 but the later date is damning enough.