[Valpal1]

If the two children were indeed running all over the house, I would expect to find the prints of both children at various places in the home. If only Danielle's prints are found then he is a liar. If no prints at all were found, then he is one fine housekeeper and probably is the neat freak described. I'm curious about the hair. Was any found on his vacuum cleaner brush head and in the bag (did they look?). If the children were bouncing all over the house, one would expect shed hair in the vacuum cleaner to be more likely than in the dryer lint trap. I am forever cutting the wound hairs of my daughters and self from the vacuum brush.

[cyncooper]

I agree. He seems to have really emphasized the kids "running all over" line. One reason I've doubted his assertion is that the primary purpose of the visit was to sell GS cookies so Danielle would be present for the cookie selling part of the conversation at least.