Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Van Dam friend describes Westerfield as 'creepy'
North County Times ^ | 6-11-02 | Kimberly Epler

Posted on 06/11/2002 8:27:12 AM PDT by Southflanknorthpawsis

Van Dam friend describes Westerfield as 'creepy' KIMBERLY EPLER Staff Writer SAN DIEGO ---- David Westerfield, the man accused of killing Danielle van Dam, was described Monday as "creepy" by a friend of the girl's parents who saw him at a bar hours before the 7-year-old disappeared.

"He was very quiet and weird," Denise Kemal, one of two women who went out drinking with Brenda van Dam, testified of Westerfield, the self-employed engineer standing trial for the crime.

The 28-year-old flight attendant said Brenda van Dam introduced her to Westerfield on Feb. 1 when they arrived at a Poway bar for a girl's night out.

Kemal said she thought it was "creepy" the way Westerfield stood watching her, the other two women and some of his friends play pool without saying anything. Judge William Mudd ordered the remarks stricken from the record after Westerfield's attorney, Steven Feldman, objected to the characterization.

Kemal also testified she saw Westerfield outside of his house the next afternoon when she went to the nearby van Dam home to speak with police about Danielle's disappearance.

Kemal was one of five witnesses on Day Four of Westerfield's trial on charges he kidnapped Danielle from her bedroom the first weekend of February and murdered her. Westerfield lived two houses down from the Sabre Springs second-grader.

Westerfield, a twice-divorced father of two, faces the death penalty if convicted. He also is charged with a misdemeanor count of child pornography. Prosecutor Jeff Dusek said that he expects to wrap up his side of the case by the end of June.

Danielle's parents, Brenda and Damon van Dam, did not attend Monday's proceedings. Judge Mudd told the couple last week that they would be notified when they could sit in on the trial. Each spent several hours on the witness stand last week, answering questions about their drug use, giving intimate details about their marriage, and describing the events leading up to their daughter's disappearance. The couple also has two sons.

Other witnesses on the stand Monday were Rich Brady, a friend of the van Dams; Keith Stone, Brady's friend and ex-brother-in-law; Garry Harvey, a friend of Westerfield's who met him at Dad's Cafe and Steakhouse on Feb. 1; and Yvette Wetli, Garry's friend, who also was at Dad's.

Most of the witnesses gave the same basic details about the events at Dad's the night Danielle was last seen alive. There were some variations. When questioned by attorneys, some of the witnesses denied making statements contained in police reports or conversations assigned to them by previous witnesses.

Kemal, a petite brunette dressed in a purple sweater and black pants, spent much of her testimony talking about the night Danielle disappeared. She testified she smoked marijuana in the van Dams' garage with Brenda van Dam and another friend, Barbara Easton, before they went out.

Kemal also said she got a phone call while in the garage and went out the side door to try and get better reception. When she came back in, Kemal said she closed the door, but didn't lock it. She testified the door was wide open at about 2 a.m. when she and Brenda van Dam went to check it after finding a warning light blinking on the home alarm system.

Kemal said she found out about Danielle's disappearance on Saturday, Feb. 2, when Damon van Dam made a brief phone call to say police wanted to talk to her about the side door.

"He told me quickly that they couldn't find her," Kemal said. "That she was missing."

When asked by Feldman, Kemal insisted she never had a conversation with Brenda or Damon van Dam about withholding from police their previous sexual relationship. Kemal testified about having a sexual encounter with Damon van Dam nearly three years ago while Brenda van Dam was with Kemal's then-husband.

The van Dams each admitted to having a sexual relationship with the two women Brenda went out with the night Danielle vanished and their male partners. Westerfield's defense team has attacked the credibility of Danielle's parents, questioning their integrity and the company they kept.

The defense attorneys have implied that the van Dams' lifestyle put their children at risk. The prosecution, meanwhile, has argued Westerfield stole Danielle from her home to satisfy his sexual fantasies for young girls.

Kemal testified the couples "swapped" their spouses after a Halloween party. Kemal testified the van Dam children were staying somewhere else that night.

She said the Halloween gatherings were not "risque," but simply costume parties complete with prizes for first, second and third place. Kemal said she briefly talked to Westerfield the morning Danielle was discovered missing after seeing him on the street.

"He said, 'I can't believe what happened,'" Kemal said, adding Westerfield told her he left by 9 p.m.

Also on the stand were Brady ---- a van Dam family friend ---- who admitted he supplied the marijuana the three women smoked that night. He said he and Stone ran into Brenda van Dam and her friends at the bar. Brady and Stone each testified they went back to the van Dam house to eat pizza about 2 a.m.

When asked by Feldman, they each said they didn't remember Brenda van Dam or Kemal talking about a side garage door being opened after they arrived at the van Dam house. Stone said Damon van Dam looked "surprised" to see him and Brady at his kitchen table when he came downstairs.

Under questioning from the prosecutor, Dusek, Stone and Brady said they did not take Danielle out of the house. Kemal also said that neither she nor Barbara took Danielle.

Later in the afternoon, Westerfield's friend, Harvey, took the stand. He said police searched his residence twice after Danielle disappeared, once with police dogs and a helicopter. A Fallbrook resident and a truck driver, Harvey said he has known Westerfield for about four years after meeting him at another Poway bar.

Harvey didn't look at Westerfield during his testimony. He said he went to a barbecue at Westerfield's house about three weeks before Danielle disappeared and he was meeting with Westerfield at the bar that night because he was helping Westerfield work out some business deals with his roommate.

He said Westerfield introduced him to Brenda van Dam and her two friends. He said he remembered the way Denise had been dancing the previous weekend.

Harvey said he didn't stay with Westerfield the whole evening . The last time he saw Westerfield was about 11:30 or 12:30 when he went to meet Wetli. When Harvey and Wetli returned to Dad's around 1 a.m., Westerfield was no longer in the bar, they each testified.

Wetli testified she had an "uncomfortable" interaction with Kemal and Brenda van Dam's other female friend, Barbara, that night. She said Barbara was sexually aggressive toward her.

Testimony in the trial continues today.


TOPICS: Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: trial; vandam; westerfield
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 181-194 next last
To: Rheo
I didn't hear that they went to any neighbor's when they found her missing. BVD even said so to the 911 dispatcher who asked if they had checked with neighbors. BVD said they had not. That in itself is weird !!!!!
121 posted on 06/11/2002 1:36:53 PM PDT by Southflanknorthpawsis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: bonfire
news on the... smart case!
122 posted on 06/11/2002 1:48:43 PM PDT by f.Christian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: All
Is anyone else getting the impression that this Detective didn't make much of an effort to look through DW's house?
123 posted on 06/11/2002 1:51:01 PM PDT by NatureGirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: NatureGirl
Sounds that way or the garage either
124 posted on 06/11/2002 1:52:00 PM PDT by Rheo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: f.Christian
If you mean the latest "crystal-ball" posts......I prefer to not comment~! Thanks anyway!
125 posted on 06/11/2002 1:54:23 PM PDT by bonfire
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy
I find the VD's and friends a whole lot creepier. But that is just my POV from sunny San Diego.
126 posted on 06/11/2002 5:41:29 PM PDT by CARepubGal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: All
Well. Looks as though the other thread has gone "bye bye".
127 posted on 06/11/2002 7:20:01 PM PDT by NatureGirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: All
D#*M it all!!

I was trying to catch up on the trial today and got as far as post 150 and the thread was deleted.

Why can't everyone just be civil and discuss the trial!!! GEEEZ!

Can someone with a little bit of intelligence recap for those of us who want to stay on top of the trial and could do without all the stupid bickering!

Thanks.

128 posted on 06/11/2002 7:23:45 PM PDT by It's me
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: It's me
That thread was NOT a big flame war..and I'm very upset. It appears that doc s went over the line...or maybe they got too many complaits about it. Count me in lurker mode for now on. I've HAD it.

For now, here's the link to the previous day's transcripts.

http://www.uniontrib.com/news/metro/danielle/index.html

129 posted on 06/11/2002 7:27:15 PM PDT by Freedom2specul8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: It's me; Jim Robinson
I went away for an hour and it was gone! I don't understand the policy of destroying many man hours of work to get rid of a couple of bickering people. Punish the guilty and let the rest of us play. John
130 posted on 06/11/2002 7:29:31 PM PDT by John Jamieson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: It's me; demsux
Yup, it's gone. Not sure who we should "thank" for this. For those who might have missed it, Karson found some transcripts over on the U-T site. I gave them a quick look, and not sure they're complete. I'm missing testimony I know I heard when I search for it there.
131 posted on 06/11/2002 7:31:03 PM PDT by MizSterious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
Which doc's do you think did it?
132 posted on 06/11/2002 7:31:27 PM PDT by John Jamieson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

Comment #133 Removed by Moderator

To: John Jamieson
I'll send you a freepmail
134 posted on 06/11/2002 7:34:00 PM PDT by Freedom2specul8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: John Jamieson
She's blaming Doc Savage, but I doubt it was him. I have my suspicions, based on past history, though.
135 posted on 06/11/2002 7:40:33 PM PDT by MizSterious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: MizSterious
The thread that was pulled was the first thread I've ever posted on!! Is this an Omen????? I thought that only offensive posts got deleted, not entire threads! There was some good info on there.
136 posted on 06/11/2002 7:48:20 PM PDT by Jrabbit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: Jrabbit
Yes, there was. Don't take it personally--it's not the first time it's happened, although it hasn't happened for a month or so. I really hate losing all that data, too.
137 posted on 06/11/2002 7:49:37 PM PDT by MizSterious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: All
I didn't think the thread was that bad. We have had MUCH worse ones, in fact I thought that even the bickering was much nicer today....very weird.
138 posted on 06/11/2002 8:01:58 PM PDT by Politicalmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]

To: It's me;all
I still have the entire thread,through 598 on my browser cache :) It died at 603. There are NO FLAMES up till then.
139 posted on 06/11/2002 8:03:00 PM PDT by Valpal1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: Politicalmom; All
What happened to the other thread?????
140 posted on 06/11/2002 8:05:42 PM PDT by Karson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 181-194 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson