Replies

>>>I believe you make a common mistake of believing headline writers and article writers are the same people.

This is FreeRepublic. The title of the article, as posted, is the real issue. After all, I can't read your mind, but I did catch your inference. Since you say, it wasn't a mistake, I'll take you at face value.

>>>The article says 80% would give up some freedom for security and that is the 80% I put you in. All I did was place you in the majority, a position you took without any help from me.

Thanks, I'm very proud to stand with such an overwhelming majority of American's, on most of the points in this specific issue. It's nice to be right, but it's better to be right and have your fellow citizens agree with you.

>>>If I even insult you, rest assured you will know it, and there will be no debate.

OMG, I can't wait to be insulted, with no strings attached. Come on, don't try and fool with me, or play silly games. I can read between the lines.

[Twisting my words, to suit your rhetoric, is wrong]

Hey, just because commas are free doesn't mean you have to use one every three words. Tauzero points out a very telling flaw in what passes for logic with you. He didn't twist your words, he made a good point against you. I guess that means it's time for you to call him a racist libertarian fringe reactionary or something.

I have recieved three (3) FReepmail letters that tell me you will argue until you have the last word and that facts will not move you. One suggested I just quit any debate you engage in, and I believe that may be the best course.

I shall leave you with a quote, stolen from a fellow FReeper:

“There is nothing more tiresome than the assumption that intellect consists of agreeing with you.” ~ A.J. Armitage, FReeper ~