I don't disagree with your statement. :-) Danielle's murder is awful.
In the spirit of responding to this case as it unfolds, as an at-home juror, I can't shake the feeling that an innocent man has been set up by a group of adult brats who should know better than to do half the stuff that they admit to in court. Heaven knows what they do that they've lied about in court!
The awfulness of Danielle's death is magnified by the fact that DW stands to get the DEATH PENALTY! (ahem, excuse the scream.)
If this were a 12-20-years case, I could be more tolerant of the VD-brats. But they are giggling and playing semantics after they sicced the cops on a guy who could be dead if they're successful.
I'll eat my words if Feldman doesn't knock down the rest of the evidence as he has so far, but another death isn't the answer to the VD-brats' 'lifestyle errors.'
IMHO. (I'm not yelling at you, Kim, and thank you for the opportunity to express my thoughts at what I am seeing, listening to and reading about this case.)