Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Dan Day
Really working hard to avoid those equations aren't you Dave? What would a state table look like for F=m*a?
100 posted on 06/10/2002 3:19:21 PM PDT by John Jamieson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies ]


To: John Jamieson
Really working hard to avoid those equations aren't you Dave?

Who's Dave?

I can't speak for Dave, but personally I wasn't "working hard" to "avoid" anything. You asked how an algorithm could be implemented without equations, and I gave the answer: By using state tables. Finite State Machines (FSMs) can implement any computable algorithm without equations or other high-level programming constructs, merely by looking up the current state and input values in the state table and then changing state/outputs to the new values listed in the table.

State tables are especially appropriate for the sort of cellular automota that Wolfram is talking about.

How you read some psychological motivation into my answer, I'll never know, but I submit that it says more about your state of mind than it does about mine.

What would a state table look like for F=m*a?

It would look like the state table for a multiplier circuit. That's basic circuit design fundamentals. Here's a Harvard EE/CS assignment that asks for that very thing as a 5-point question: http://www.eecs.harvard.edu/cs141/asst/ass6.pdf (Pre-lab problem #2). That's for a simplified circuit (4-bit integer multiplier), but the floating-point state table isn't all that much harder once you've got the basics.

104 posted on 06/10/2002 5:52:58 PM PDT by Dan Day
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson