"Banish" them to where? Your reply makes no sense. Are you saying that if this data is correct then all males should be segragated from all children? No, I believe that cure would be worse than the disease. IF this data and the underlying assumptions are correct then it tells us that we should be very hesitant to put our male children in situations where they could be alone in the company of male homosexuals. Understand, however, that I offer no opinion on whether the data and assumptions in this study are sound as I have no idea whether these underlying variables have been subject to peer review or professional scrutiny. I merely comment on the correlation your original post failed to pick up on.
I'm trying to hold homophobes to their own arguments. Logic is consistent. Illogic is inconsisent.
If it is right to hate all homosexuals because some are molesters of children, then it is right to hate all males because some are molesters of children.
As the author says, the vast majority of child molesters are males, and 2/3 of those molested are females. That's hetero (for those who are confused about it.)
So clearly the vast majority of child molesations are male heterosexuals molesting young girls. We've identified the major source of the problem!!!! Yep, 2/3rds (that's more than half, for those who are confused about it.) So where is the hate for heterosexual males?
Are the femnazis right? Should males be hated by default? According to the homophobe logic, the answer is yes! Femnazis and homophobes read from the same logic book.