Doesn't that mean that 2/3rds of the victims are female. Ha ha ha ha ha. Nice homobashing that blows up in the homophobes face.
You stepped on it dude. Homosexual men molest young boys at a rate ten times higher than the general population molestors of either sex. Thats a fact, deal with it.
You miss the point entirely. Since 97% of males are hetrosexual, you would expect, all things being equal, that 97% of the victims would be female. What this study purports to show is that since one third of the victims are male, then the 3% of the population of adult males who are homos account for one third (33.3%) of the victims - ie. male homos account for a vastly disproportionate amount of child molestation. The author obviously assumes that female molestation is so rare that its impact on these statistics is negligable; I don't know if that's true or not. But, if you accept his data and assumtions as true, then it paints a picture of male homosexuals as much more likely than their heto counterparts to be child molestors.
More misuse of the definition hmm? Im pretty sure no one at the FRC has latent tendencies or is in denial, youll just have to remain the dolt who doesnt know any better.