I agree that abiogenesis is not presently a science. RNA world speculation may well be an active science now, with the acceptance of Woese's work by the general biological sciences community. However, the heart of abiogenesis, which is not RNA-world, is not yet on the scientific table in any meaningful sense. To say that such speculation somehow "violates" science is absurd. Formal science has no opinion on un-scientific, or pre-scientific subjects--and no veto to exercise even if it had an opinion.
Fair enough. :-)