[Tribune7]

Kindly submit your proof that the approaches I have suggested are the only possible ways to falsify abiogensis.

You are crossing the line from silly to pointlessly ridiculous. I asked you how you would falsify abiogenesis and you basically said you can't.

I'm content with the math proofs indicating that for all practical expectations it is false. In my view, it has been falsified.

[donh]

You are crossing the line from silly to pointlessly ridiculous. I asked you how you would falsify abiogenesis and you basically said you can't.

Oh really. Where did I say that no one could come up with a counterexample? Where did I say that mine was the only possible approach? You have a real problem with categories don't you? Believe it or not, my opinion does not represent closure on what science is capable of thinking. I know this may be a shock.

I'm content with the math proofs indicating that for all practical expectations it is false. In my view, it has been falsified.

And I wish you every happiness with your view, but if you continue to suggest that this is science's view, I will continue to object, as it is plainly not.