Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Westerfield On Trial (WEEK 1 Recap): Brenda Van Dam, Dad's Bar
KGTV 10 News-San Diego ^ | June 7, 2002 | KGTV

Posted on 06/06/2002 10:15:36 PM PDT by FresnoDA

Westerfield On Trial....WEEK 1 Recap....

 

Day 3: Brenda Van Dam, Dad's Bar

Mother Of Murdered Girl Breaks Down On Stand

Posted: 7:16 p.m. PDT June 6, 2002
Updated: 7:42 p.m. PDT June 6, 2002
SAN DIEGO -- No concerted effort was made between Brenda and Damon van Dam to withhold "lifestyle" information from police officers investigating the disappearance of their daughter, the mother testified Thursday.
Brenda van Dam was on the witness stand most of the third day of David Westerfield's kidnap and murder trial.

Westerfield, 50, is accused of abducting and killing 7-year-old Danielle van Dam and could face the death penalty if convicted. The child's mother reported her missing the morning of Feb. 2.

Brenda van Dam told prosecutor Jeff Dusek she disclosed to officers everything about her "open marriage" once they made it clear that it was important.

The mother said she didn't discuss her decision not to disclose information with her husband.

"I would have told (the police) anything they needed to get Danielle back," the mother said.

Video
alt
alt
Video Summary Of Day 3
VideoAttorney Milt Silverman's Analysis Of Day 3
alt
Click Here For Video Help
Brenda van Dam said nothing else was taken the night Danielle was abducted.

"I wish they'd taken everything else but her," the mother said tearfully.

Earlier in the day, Brenda van Dam testified there were never any sex parties at her Sabre Springs home.

She later said that during a Halloween party last October, she and her husband had sex with a friend and her husband in the van Dam home.

Westerfield, a self-employed engineer, is accused of kidnapping the second- grader, killing her and dumping the body near rural Dehesa Road, where it was found more than three weeks after she disappeared.

Brenda van Dam broke down a minute into her testimony, when asked to name her children and give their ages, then later while testifying about a father-daughter dance Danielle was scheduled to attend with her father a week after she vanished.

Dusek asked the mother about the first of two "girls nights out" at Dad's Cafe in Poway with two girlfriends. Dusek asked if any men were invited to the Jan. 25 get-together at Dad's Cafe. Van dam said no.

"Was there a sex party at your house when you got home?" Dusek asked, hoping to pre-empt an anticipated defense attack on the mother during cross-examination.

"There's never been a sex party at my house," she responded matter-of-factly.

She also described previous contacts with the defendant -- she had said he bought her a drink at Dad's -- including a visit to his house with Danielle and her younger brother to sell Girl Scout cookies.

While the children were playing in his back yard, she said the twice-divorced Westerfield told her he was interested in her friend, Barbara Easton, who had caught his eye at Dad's.

On the second outing to Dad's, Easton walked right up to Westerfield and began talking to him, van Dam told the court.

Brenda denied dancing with the defendant on either occasion.

Earlier in the day, Medical Examiner Brian Blackbourne was asked about the cause and time of Danielle's death.

The girl's body was so decomposed when found by a volunteer searcher that it was impossible to establish a cause of death, Blackbourne had said Wednesday.

Thursday, he estimated her time of death at anywhere from 10 days to six weeks before the body was found Feb. 27.

Blackbourne also said it was possible that air temperature could be a variable in judging when she died. That led defense attorney Steven Feldman to suggest that especially hot days in late February could have accelerated the decomposition process.

In his opening statement Tuesday, Feldman told the jury that Westerfield could not possibly have dumped Danielle's body after Feb. 6, because he was under constant scrutiny by the police and the media.

"Is it your professional opinion (Danielle) could have been alive Feb. 6?" Feldman asked.

"Based on my observations? Yes," Blackbourne said.

"Feb. 7?"

"Yes."

"Feb. 17?" Feldman pressed.

"Possibly, yes," Blackbourne answered.

"Depending on the weather conditions, Feb. 22nd?" Feldman asked.

"That's pushing it for what I can accept," Blackbourne said.

He also testified he checked Danielle's body for signs of sexual assault but found none, primarily because of tissue damage from decomposition and animal activity.

Wednesday, the child's father admitted he lied to police about use of marijuana in the garage of his house the night of Feb. 1 -- hours before his daughter turned up missing.

He also told the court that on prior occasions he engaged in sex with both of Brenda's female friends.

A bartender at Dad's Cafe in Poway characterized Westerfield as a "people watcher," but termed a police report on the behavior of Brenda van Dam and two friends inaccurate.

Sean Brown said he was at work as a bar manager on the two nights that have come up in testimony in the case: Jan. 25 and Feb. 1.

It was Feb. 2 that the Sabre Springs 7-year-old was discovered missing.

Westerfield would talk to a regular customer, "hang out" and watch people as they drank and danced, Brown said. The bartender said he never saw the defendant dance or play pool.

Brown said Westerfield would drink 16-ounce rum-and-cokes.

"I believe David had a few drinks," Brown said of Feb. 1. "He was feeling good. He'd taken the edge off. I don't believe he was drunk."

He said the same about Brenda van Dam.

"I don't think she was drunk," Brown testified. "She was in good spirits but was in control of herself. She wasn't slurring."

Under cross-examination by co-defense counsel Robert Boyce, Brown said a police report containing his statements on the behavior of Brenda and her two friends was inaccurate.

Brown testified he warned prosecutor Jeff Dusek about the discrepancy during the lunch hour -- hours before he testified.

The statement from police indicated the women were "flirtatious toward males" and "partying hard."

Brown testified that the women were having fun as girlfriends do. He said he never saw them act inappropriately.

Brown was dismissed as a witness as the court day ended.



TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: vandam; westerfield
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 321-340341-360361-380381-396 next last
To: RnMomof7
Green eyes in literature and folklore are a common metaphor and sign of jealousy. Shakespeare uses green eyes to indicate Othello's intense jealousy.
361 posted on 06/08/2002 1:49:02 PM PDT by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 303 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper
"bad behavior in here going on"..

Careful, cyn...I don't see any "bad behavior", just someone trying to disrupt a thread...and it isn't me.

sw

362 posted on 06/08/2002 1:56:28 PM PDT by spectre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 359 | View Replies]

To: spectre
I'm sorry, I don't intend to disrupt. I have read all of these threads and felt like throwing my opinion into the mix. I'm off now-----have a great weekend.
363 posted on 06/08/2002 2:00:48 PM PDT by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 362 | View Replies]

To: spectre
I just re-read your comments and realized you may have thought by "bad behavior" I meant FReepers. No! I meant the van Dams! Sorry about any confusion.
364 posted on 06/08/2002 2:02:35 PM PDT by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 362 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper
I apologize for misunderstanding you.

In the transcripts, Brenda refers to going to Domino's and getting "the Pizza". I assumed for if it were more than one she would have said "the Pizza's".

My husband is going to Domino's this evening to pick up our Pizza's..because we talked about it so much today.

We've all assumed it was only ONE, BUT, no real proof either way...I guess.

sw

365 posted on 06/08/2002 2:12:44 PM PDT by spectre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 364 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper
Some of us can stay all the way up to 2 or 3 in the morning without the use of cocaine.

I sometimes stay up until 2 or 3 but I haven't had a full day of chores, errands and an evening of dancing and pool playing when I do it.

And since I have seen zero evidence that they used it, I'll go with the evidence so far.

True, we've heard no evidence of cocaine yet. I have noticed however that both VDs mention drinking diet coke every chance they get. Why?

About the joint, no I don't find it odd for several people to take a couple hits off of one joint and have it last.

In opening statements the prosecutor said they had more than one joint. He mentioned the one at the house and then he said they went outside to the truck at Dad's and pulled out another joint. He said it, not me.

I think Brenda said "pick up pizza" and not "pick up A pizza")

I haven't heard if it was one pizza or more. It is true that Dominos is famous for their "2nd pizza for half price" deal. There are many other things that bother me more than how many pizzas they had for dinner. Heck, in my area it would be easy to find out how many, what kind and when she got it/them. The pizza place has it in their computer!

366 posted on 06/08/2002 2:15:40 PM PDT by Karson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 359 | View Replies]

To: All
Can anybody tell me if Brenda was excused on Thursday or if she is subject to recall? I know Damon was not excused but didn't hear the end of Brenda's testimony.
367 posted on 06/08/2002 2:23:30 PM PDT by Karson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 366 | View Replies]

To: spectre
We are still very early on in the trial, and don't honestly know what happened between 8pm and 2pm at the van Dam house when Damon was supposed to be home baby-sitting. He is his own alibi and witness, SO FAR.

There have been rumors he left the house, and it could have been possible for him to plant evidence or take Danielle elsewhere during that time. It's a blank...for now.


I have also thought of this scenario (Damon took 'the body' and dumped her after accidentally or not so accidentally killing her), and I haven't seen/heard any evidence to counter it yet in the trial.

The thing I can't possibly imagine that he could do or Brenda could put up with, after finding out the truth, is leaving their little girl in the woods to decay and be eaten. I just can't imagine it. If he had accidentally killed her, there should be some other way to have her be found that wouldn't be so cruel, sad, and disgusting. After all, she was still their daughter.

Inventing a story about how she accidentally died would have been so much more decent than have her be dumped like trash and eaten by animals.

I don't know. Maybe it's just me; the way she was disposed of and the way she was found makes me very sad, and it's hard to believe that anyone but a stranger could do that to her.
368 posted on 06/08/2002 2:25:19 PM PDT by sbnsd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 355 | View Replies]

To: spectre
I really believe BVD and Damon set up a string of alibi's from day one, and that DW's going camping was a big payoff for them...Jackpot!

Maybe it wasn't by chance they knew DW was going to go camping. Perhaps through one of their many conversations together, DW told BvD that he was going camping. She had told him about DvD's trip to Big Bear that weekend; DW may have done likewise. He hasn't testified so we don't know what he's said or not said.
OR
the VDs know that he takes off in his MH every (say) first weekend of the month. Maybe DW has a pattern or habit of doing this EVERY weekend. I don't know. Maybe they just knew he would go off in his MH and that would look suspicious the next morning when they report their daughter missing.
369 posted on 06/08/2002 2:32:24 PM PDT by sbnsd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 346 | View Replies]

To: All
Is this correct? "Rich was married to Keith's sister and now they are divorced."

Does this mean that Rich is now a single guy or he is married to someone else now? I remember at PH, BvD said that Rich was Liz Brady's husband.

370 posted on 06/08/2002 2:43:23 PM PDT by Karson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 367 | View Replies]

To: Jaded
There is of course also the possibility of Danielle entering the RV at some time when it was parked by DW's house. Does anyone know the direction the back window of the RV would have been facing when parked in front of the house? Reason being, if back window (where I belive the prints were found) faced towards Danielle's house I could easily see her using for a great hide-and-seek spot where you could even observe your other buddies looking for you. As a matter of fact some RV's have that one way glass where you can look out but not in don't they?

It also gives creedence to the eyesore thing, I mean it wasn't like he parked the thing on his front lawn so why the big concern over it being an eyesore? Unless one of your kids told you that his brother/sister used it as a hiding spot in a game one day, then it's going to become a big concern for you.

371 posted on 06/08/2002 2:50:18 PM PDT by alexandria
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 351 | View Replies]

To: sbnsd
I don't think Danielle was deliberately murdered. There are a ton of scenerios that various forums have come up with. Some are very interesting.

As far as Damon dumping her body...he could have known someone who did....I think that's possible.

sw

372 posted on 06/08/2002 3:02:08 PM PDT by spectre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 369 | View Replies]

To: spectre
I agree, I'm really leaning toward the "run over by a drunk party goer" theory.
373 posted on 06/08/2002 3:27:25 PM PDT by John Jamieson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 372 | View Replies]

To: John Jamieson
I'm really leaning toward the "run over by a drunk party goer" theory.

Am I mistaken that the ME said there were no fractured bones? I don't know how a child could be killed by a car without some signs of injuries to her bones.

374 posted on 06/08/2002 3:31:19 PM PDT by Karson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 373 | View Replies]

To: Karson
Am I mistaken that the ME said there were no fractured bones?

I think so. I think the ME said that there were no open wounds (no blood). She wasn't shot, or strangled, or stabbed. Something that you physically couldn't find. So, they speculated suffocation and tried to support this theory with her loss of teeth.

I asked before, but I'm not sure I got an answer. What about non-physical traumas that aren't provable since the body has decomposed so badly? Things such as: poison, drug overdose, drowning, internal injuries, any kind of organ failure, etc.

If she was hit by a car, maybe she didn't break any bones, but had internal injuries. Since her organs were gone or decayed, they can't prove internal injuries, could they?
375 posted on 06/08/2002 3:39:25 PM PDT by sbnsd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 374 | View Replies]

To: spectre
I don't think Danielle was deliberately murdered. There are a ton of scenerios that various forums have come up with. Some are very interesting.

I think if DvD had done it, it wouldn't have been deliberate either.
What are some of the other forums? I would be really interested in reading other scenarios. Thanks.
376 posted on 06/08/2002 3:45:40 PM PDT by sbnsd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 372 | View Replies]

To: FresnoDA; Mrs. Liberty; demsux; Jaded; skipjackcity; UCANSEE2; RnMomof7; spectre;BARLF; FriarTom...
NEW THREAD, anyone?
377 posted on 06/08/2002 3:47:31 PM PDT by MizSterious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 375 | View Replies]

To: sbnsd
Things such as: poison, drug overdose, drowning, internal injuries, any kind of organ failure, etc.

I did hear him say they ruled out poison, drugs, natural causes and I think drowning. I believe suffociation was the only viable manner of death and that's why they were talking about the teeth. Remember, the dentist and the ME said there was no evidence of blunt force trauma. Only "soft trauma".

To All: I found the answer to my earlier question about Brenda being subject to recall. She is.

378 posted on 06/08/2002 3:48:40 PM PDT by Karson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 375 | View Replies]

To: Karson
I did hear him say they ruled out poison, drugs, natural causes and I think drowning. I believe suffociation was the only viable manner of death and that's why they were talking about the teeth. Remember, the dentist and the ME said there was no evidence of blunt force trauma. Only "soft trauma".

Thanks, Karson. I missed that part completely. I wonder how they can rule that stuff out after such a state of decomposition.
379 posted on 06/08/2002 3:56:43 PM PDT by sbnsd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 378 | View Replies]

To: spectre
you got that right sw, cyn is looking to end a thread
380 posted on 06/08/2002 4:25:30 PM PDT by demsux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 362 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 321-340341-360361-380381-396 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson