[ReveBM]

I think the NYT magazine article mentioned was from 2 weeks ago, with a yellow cover if I remember correctly. It was a think piece about five pages in length. Basically, what it left me with was that the author's idea was that "the best evidence that a nuclear attack on New York won't happen is that one hasn't happened already". There was a lot of other less-than-nuke-explosion stuff that was pretty nasty too.

[Timesink]

Thanks ReveBM!