[LiberalBuster]

>>I have never seen Rush featured so prominently before on a 
>>nightly newscast, is this the result of the heat we here 
>>at FR have been bringing down on El Rushbo since his Bush 
>>bashing Monday?

You're clueless for a number of reasons. First, Rush wasn't "bashing" Bush on Monday. He was being true to conservative (NOT Republican) principles. Which is more than can be said for Shrub.

Second, the only reason the mainstream media would mention Bush and Rush in the same sentence would be to try to paint Bush as a right-wing extremist. It has nothing whatsoever to do with what some clueless FReepers may or may not have done.

[BOBTHENAILER]

It has nothing whatsoever to do with what some clueless FReepers may or may not have done.

Thanks for all the clues. I always enjoy listening to experts here at FR.

Clueless in debattle

[codebreaker]

I would call the 'AlGore' editorial on his site Bush Bashing.

But Rush modified his position the next day, so no hard feelings.

[GodBlessUSA]

Thank You LiberalBuster! I am so disappointed to hear people attacking Rush. I can't believe how some people have been bashing Rush lately, on numbers of threads. Rush does so much for the conservatives. Rush is not a yes man. He has integrity. I am thankful that Rush is not a go along guy. He is honest. If you look into the issue areas of Rush's disagreements with administration, (Not Bush Bashing, the disagreements) it is obvious. Would some people prefer that he agrees with everything the Bush Administration does, even if it's not what the republican/conservative parties stand for? I am relieved Rush is addressing these matters. If he didn't, it wouldn't be Rush. It appears some people are doing the same thing that they are claiming Rush to be doing. They don't agree with Rush and attack him. I don't read much debate on topics he disagrees with, just alot of Rush Bashing. He is standing firm. Bush is a great man. I will always support Bush, but wish he would stand firm with the issues he ran his campaign on.