To: scalia_#1
Exactly! C'mon, F16Fighter, you know better! Remember when Clinton was in trouble for sexual harassment and the NOW gals stood by their man? You won't find any quotes from them crticizing Clinton! And we here at FR never excortiated them for abandoning their supposed "principles." So why for goodness sakes would you tolerate Rush not following their lead? Huh? Please tell me where Bush has been accused of lying under oath? Oh well, you all can take a NYT story as the "gospel", that's your problem.
BTW, if Rush ever does a real "mea culpa" over this, I would suggest his radio engineers to get out of the way and take cover, because of the rock hard peojectiles that will be going through the glass as his head explodes.
54 posted on
06/06/2002 4:23:36 PM PDT by
Dane
To: Dane
Huh? Please tell me where Bush has been accused of lying under oath? Oh well, you all can take a NYT story as the "gospel", that's your problem.
I love it! I thought it would take you at least two posts to accuse me of reading the New York Times, but you did it in one! I promise I will never underestimate you again. I'm not going to bother spelling out for you that my post had nothing to do with lying under oath and everything to do with the unrelenting baloney that if you criticize President Bush's policies, you must (a) hate him, (b) hate America, (c) read the New York Times, and often (d) all of the above. Thanks for helping me prove that.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson