Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: perotista
If the job isn't worth $7/hr, it's not worth $37/hr either, so it still wouldn't get done. The difference would be that I could go to the union or individuals and try to make a deal to get workers at a wage I can afford to pay, not an option with a living wage law.

Or, as already mentioned, I say fine, pay the $7/hr and raise the price of my goods. Me and millions of other businesses do that, so the living wage has to go up, so at least one large round of inflation has to happen, even graciously assuming that it slows or even stops after that. That means that the college fund you've been putting into for 15 years is now good for the first semester, or the house down payment you've been saving up for is now another five years away, etc. Only fair to compensate people for that too, right? After all, it was a government decision, not some failing on their part, so subsidizing the education or the housing market is the right thing to do. After all, being a good Christian conservative, you wouldn't want people to lose their life savings, would you?

48 posted on 06/06/2002 7:31:37 AM PDT by m1911
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson