Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ann Coulter: Build Them Back
Front Page Magazine ^ | June 6, 2002 | Ann Coulter

Posted on 06/06/2002 3:50:27 AM PDT by fporretto

SINCE SEPT. 11, we have been authoritatively informed that buildings as tall as the World Trade Center will never be built again. A "consensus" quickly emerged among city officials to replace the soaring Twin Towers with some potty-little buildings and a park.

Make Comments
View Comments
Printable Article
Email Article

But at a meeting to discuss the future of the site last week, hundreds of New Yorkers showed up and shocked the experts by demanding that the towers be rebuilt. One man, who worked on the 77th floor of 1 World Trade Center, said: "Please do not diminish the memory of all of the people who died there by building 50-, 60- or 70-story mediocre buildings on the site."

A little grassy park where people go to weep does lack something in the way of defiance. Instead of us crying, evidently many Americans feel there should be a lot of Arabs crying.

The reason liberals prefer a park to luminous skyscrapers is that they are not angry. Liberals express sympathy for the victims, but they're not angry at the terrorists. Instead of longing to crush and humiliate the enemy, they believe true patriotism consists of redoubled efforts to expand the welfare state. Sen. Hillary Clinton proposed a school for the site and Sen. Charles Schumer, a park. That'll show 'em!

Meanwhile, the construction workers clearing away the rubble vowed they would work without pay to rebuild the World Trade Center. Of course, now that we have 14 cows, that shouldn't be necessary. (In one of the most genuinely touching stories since Sept. 11, a tiny cow-herding village in Kenya that only recently got word of the attack on America made a special present of 14 cows to the United States this week.)

The attack on the World Trade Center ripped America's soul not only for the thousands of lives it consumed. Even if the towers had been empty, the destruction of those buildings would have been heart wrenching.

Skyscrapers are the hallmark of civilization. They are monuments to human brilliance and creativity. I'm sure there are some nice trees, but I note that no one ever talks about the "heavenly suburb." Philosopher Jacques Ellul said cities exhibit "all the hopes of man for divinity." St. Augustine said the "house of God is itself a city."

There have been many unsubstantiated assertions that no one would rent property in a rebuilt World Trade Center. But if fear of another terrorist attack were a major factor in New Yorkers' decisional calculus, they wouldn't be living in New York. The military has the technology to make the buildings safe from incoming missiles. Sept. 11 was a sucker punch. That particular trick doesn't work twice.

Moreover, this argument neglects to consider that by the time a new World Trade Center is built, Arabs will be about as threatening as the Japanese. Who would have imagined after Pearl Harbor that the Japanese were governable? Yet Japan hasn't shown a disposition to fight in 60 years. It is the rare individual who does not succumb to horrendous physical pain. Muslims feel humiliated now? We'll show them humiliated.

Aesthetes complain that the buildings were ugly. Perhaps. But the important thing is, they were really big. There can be a new design, but whatever goes up on that site has got to be bigger and better than the buildings the savages destroyed.

Erecting enormous buildings to replace the Twin Towers limns the distinction between us and the barbarians. We can ride elevators a quarter-mile into the sky and have dinner. What can they do? Multimillionaire Osama bin Laden lived in a cave (and is dead, under a daisy-cutter). Here in America, ordinary Americans consider 70-story buildings "mediocre."

As Donald Rumsfeld said of al-Qaeda, their specialty is "destroying things they could never have built themselves using technologies they never could have developed themselves."

The urge to destroy may not come from Islam, but creation is not Islam's strong suit either. In his immense book "The Creators," historian Daniel Boorstin explains the Islamic approach to innovation. While Judaism and Christianity begin with the Creation, Islam reveres a God who creates nothing. It is a central tenet of Islam that God did not even create the Koran. According to Boorstin, mullahs explain that since "the speech of God is uncreate, the words must be eternal uncreate." The world comes into being not by God's energy and initiative, but by fiat. As Boorstin says: "For a believing Muslim, to create is a rash and dangerous act."

And we wonder why they don't have chairs.

Not surprisingly, Mohamed Atta loathed skyscrapers. Newsweek reported that he viewed the emergence of tall buildings in Egypt as an odious surrender to Western values. The most fitting memorial to the victims of the World Trade Center attack is to build the most breathtaking skyscraper in the world on top of Mohamed Atta's grave.


TOPICS: Editorial; Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS: anncoulterlist; terrorism; worldtradecenter
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121-132 next last
To: MissAmericanPie
..take away their ju ju, and they go back to sitting on their rocks, watching the fleas nip at their ankles.

LOL! C'mon America, let's take away their ju-ju!

61 posted on 06/06/2002 7:03:28 AM PDT by Zack Nguyen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Zack Nguyen
Italics off.
62 posted on 06/06/2002 7:04:25 AM PDT by Zack Nguyen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: PBRSTREETGANG
While I truly believe that the markets (real estate and insurance) will ultimately not allow the towers to be built back as they were, I'm in favor of new towers with the UN in the top floors of one and the INS in the top floors of the other.

Perhaps Target stores could buy naming rights; we'd call them the "target towers".

63 posted on 06/06/2002 7:05:11 AM PDT by meyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Luis Gonzalez
BUMPING Ann!

But she looks like she'd snap in half. Would somebody feed this woman already?

64 posted on 06/06/2002 7:05:43 AM PDT by steve-b
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Marysecretary
Can't these women be a little more imaginative with the hair?

Their hair is perfect. Both women!! IMHO, of course... :^)

65 posted on 06/06/2002 7:06:58 AM PDT by meyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
Frankly, I'm surprised she didn't ask for a monument to honor the victims of gun violence

Haven't ya heard .. Hilda like guns now .. she use to be a Duck Hunter

This women kills me ... of ALL the things she has ever said .. that tops them .. LOL

66 posted on 06/06/2002 7:07:38 AM PDT by Mo1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: PBRSTREETGANG
I have a few more tenent suggestions to go along with the UN and INS. Let's put the headquarters of the CIA, FBI and NSA there as well. That would provide them with some additional motivation.
67 posted on 06/06/2002 7:07:49 AM PDT by Durus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: RightFighter
Well, ya just HAD to bring it up.....

Who's The Hottest Newsbabe

I'm glad I saved this...

68 posted on 06/06/2002 7:11:33 AM PDT by RandallFlagg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Mo1
Haven't ya heard .. Hilda like guns now .. she use to be a Duck Hunter

Oh, I forgot about that. She can't remember what sort of weapon she used; how many ducks she bagged; anything about the species of duck she was hunting; anything about hunter etiquette; anything about hunting rules and regulations; the dates of her hunts; or where she hunted -- but she remembers it clearly.

I think she was even a life member of the NRA once. She has the jacket somewhere. But then the NRA became too radical for her.

69 posted on 06/06/2002 7:12:39 AM PDT by Lazamataz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: steve-b
But she looks like she'd snap in half. Would somebody feed this woman already?

I've offered to, if she'd show up in Chattanooga. So far, no response to my pleadings on FR. :)
I was thinking of a nice thick strip steak, grilled to order; huge baked potato, fresh corn on the cob, salad. Fine red wine. Heck, I'd even bring out the finest stainless silverware for this.

Are you listening, Ann??? MMmmmmmm, grilled steak, seasoned with select spices.

70 posted on 06/06/2002 7:13:58 AM PDT by meyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: RightFighter
Okay, I just don't understand this Freeper obsession with Ann Coulter.
I mean, I think she's a great conservative and all. Maybe it's just the cigarettes, and the fact that she's a little too skinny for my taste, but she just doesn't strike me as worthy of the pedestal some of you guys place her on. Now, Heather Nauert is another story altogether...
"De gustibus, non est disputandem."
Heather is nice, too.
But we also love Ann for her BRAIN!
Here is the column that got her booted by the "girly-boys" at NRO:

This Is War
We should invade their countries.

Ms. Coulter is also a syndicated columnist
September 13, 2001 9:05 a.m.

arbara Olson kept her cool. In the hysteria and terror of hijackers herding passengers to the rear of the plane, she retrieved her cell phone and called her husband, Ted, the solicitor general of the United States. She informed him that he had better call the FBI — the plane had been hijacked. According to reports, Barbara was still on the phone with Ted when her plane plunged in a fiery explosion directly into the Pentagon.

Barbara risked having her neck slit to warn the country of a terrorist attack. She was a patriot to the very end.

This is not to engage in the media's typical hallucinatory overstatement about anyone who is the victim of a horrible tragedy. The furtive cell phone call was an act of incredible daring and panache. If it were not, we'd be hearing reports of a hundred more cell phone calls. (Even people who swear to hate cell phones carry them for commercial air travel.)

The last time I saw Barbara in person was about three weeks ago. She generously praised one of my recent columns and told me I had really found my niche. Ted, she said, had taken to reading my columns aloud to her over breakfast.

I mention that to say three things about Barbara. First, she was really nice. A lot of people on TV seem nice, but aren't. (And some who don't seem nice, are.) But Barbara was always her charming, graceful, vebullient self. "Nice" is an amazingly rare quality among writers. In the opinion business, bitter, jealous hatred is the norm. Barbara had reason to be secure.

Second, it was actually easy to imagine Ted reading political columns aloud to Barbara at the breakfast table. Theirs was a relationship that could only be cheaply imitated by Bill and Hillary — the latter being a subject of Barbara's appropriately biting bestseller, Hell to Pay. Hillary claimed preposterously in the Talk magazine interview that she discussed policy with Bill while cutting his grapefruit in the morning. Ted and Barbara really did talk politics — and really did have breakfast together.

It's "Ted and Barbara" just like it's Fred and Ginger, and George and Gracie. They were so perfect together, so obvious, that their friends were as happy they were on their wedding day. This is more than the death of a great person and patriotic American. It's a human amputation.

Third, since Barbara's compliment, I've been writing my columns for Ted and Barbara. I'm always writing to someone in my head. Now I don't know who to write to. Ted-and-Barbara were a good muse.

Apart from hearing that this beautiful light has been extinguished from the world, only one other news flash broke beyond the numbingly omnipresent horror of the entire day. That evening, CNN reported that bombs were dropping in Afghanistan — and then updated the report to say they weren't our bombs.

They should have been ours. I want them to be ours.

This is no time to be precious about locating the exact individuals directly involved in this particular terrorist attack. Those responsible include anyone anywhere in the world who smiled in response to the annihilation of patriots like Barbara Olson.

We don't need long investigations of the forensic evidence to determine with scientific accuracy the person or persons who ordered this specific attack. We don't need an "international coalition." We don't need a study on "terrorism." We certainly didn't need a congressional resolution condemning the attack this week.

The nation has been invaded by a fanatical, murderous cult. And we welcome them. We are so good and so pure we would never engage in discriminatory racial or "religious" profiling.

People who want our country destroyed live here, work for our airlines, and are submitted to the exact same airport shakedown as a lumberman from Idaho. This would be like having the Wehrmacht immigrate to America and work for our airlines during World War II. Except the Wehrmacht was not so bloodthirsty.

"All of our lives" don't need to change, as they keep prattling on TV. Every single time there is a terrorist attack — or a plane crashes because of pilot error — Americans allow their rights to be contracted for no purpose whatsoever.

The airport kabuki theater of magnetometers, asinine questions about whether passengers "packed their own bags," and the hostile, lumpen mesomorphs ripping open our luggage somehow allowed over a dozen armed hijackers to board four American planes almost simultaneously on Bloody Tuesday. (Did those fabulous security procedures stop a single hijacker anyplace in America that day?)

Airports scrupulously apply the same laughably ineffective airport harassment to Suzy Chapstick as to Muslim hijackers. It is preposterous to assume every passenger is a potential crazed homicidal maniac. We know who the homicidal maniacs are. They are the ones cheering and dancing right now.

We should invade their countries, kill their leaders and convert them to Christianity. We weren't punctilious about locating and punishing only Hitler and his top officers. We carpet-bombed German cities; we killed civilians. That's war. And this is war.

© 2001 Universal Press Syndicate

You GO, girl!

71 posted on 06/06/2002 7:16:19 AM PDT by RonDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
She can't remember what sort of weapon she used

I guess this means we can't ask Hilda .. "What did she know and when did she know it" Huh???

72 posted on 06/06/2002 7:16:27 AM PDT by Mo1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: flamefront
Cool link. I'd sure like to see them rebuilt. Maybe something visually and structurally tying them together like the Metropolis International on your link (but also at the top) would give occupants a better feeling about their safety. For sure they will be super engineered.
73 posted on 06/06/2002 7:20:36 AM PDT by ironman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: fporretto
Skyscrapers are the hallmark of civilization.

Huh?

"Going up? C'mon, I'll show you where your sunlight went."

74 posted on 06/06/2002 7:33:45 AM PDT by Askel5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: steve-b
Someone once posted an idea to place a mosque on the top floor. I imagine that would be a pretty effective deterrent!
75 posted on 06/06/2002 7:44:47 AM PDT by Future Snake Eater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: OldFriend
Yes, if we protected our homeland security, as we did until Clinton became president. I would gladly work on the top floor myself, chained to Yasser Arafat.
76 posted on 06/06/2002 7:49:34 AM PDT by Chemnitz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Future Snake Eater
Someone once posted an idea to place a mosque on the top floor. I imagine that would be a pretty effective deterrent!

You would think that this is true, but they've been shown to eat their own to advance their twisted religion.

77 posted on 06/06/2002 7:49:43 AM PDT by meyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: meyer
build 4 towers one for each plane
78 posted on 06/06/2002 7:59:47 AM PDT by TLBSHOW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: Future Snake Eater
Nah, put the CIA and FBI offices on the top floors. And on each floor put a plaque with a list of the names of the dead from that floor on it.

I was thinking, if instead of two towers they made one tower with a base so large it covered the area of the base of both the original towers, would a similar attack wipe out a whole floor, or would it leave part of the impacted floor intact enough to allow those above to escape?

79 posted on 06/06/2002 8:04:13 AM PDT by Grig
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: Grig
I don't know...you're talking about a lot of momentum, and a lot of energy released in such an impact. Theoretically I suppose it would be possible. I'll have to ask my roommate (he's a civil engineer).
80 posted on 06/06/2002 8:12:31 AM PDT by Future Snake Eater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121-132 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson