[Politicalmom]

Oh, good grief. I suppose lying under oath is acceptable to you? Feldman is allowed to show that Damon apparently doesn't know the truth if it hits him in the rear.

Their actions on the day of the disappearance are relevant. And many reasonable people believe that their lifestyle may have had something to do with the crime. Do you have PROOF that it "had zip to do with the crime"?

I can't BELIEVE some of the statements made recently. Why bother with a trial? Just fry DW and you can all go back to your comfortable lives. SOME of us would like to be CERTAIN that the RIGHT person gets fried.

[MizSterious]

SOME of us would like to be CERTAIN that the RIGHT person gets fried.

Brava! I think there are two things that most of us (emphasis on most) will agree to: 1. Danielle is the victim here; and 2. Your point, stated so eloquently above.

[Amore]

Oh, lighten up! it's California, he'll never get "fried!"

(and that was only a joke) :- )

[MissAmericanPie]

Her blood and hair is on his clothes and in his motor home, that should be pleanty of evidence for any jury. The rest is smoke and mirrors and an attempt to play on the prejudices of jurors and should not have been allowed.