Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: bvw
Okay, that's the glasses you are seeing through. If now, someone's chopper shop got broken into, don't you think that which MC or which type of MC a suspect on trial belonged to would be pertinant in presenting to the jury?

Actually, the nastiest biker I knew owned the chopper shop. But to your point, the crowd the suspect hung around would be pertinent. The defense doesn't need to be asking the store owner if he hung around the wrong crowd. That would be the investigator's job when trying to find a perpetrator.

837 posted on 06/07/2002 8:56:32 AM PDT by Quila
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 836 | View Replies ]


To: Quila
The defense doesn't need to be asking the store owner if he hung around the wrong crowd.

Actually, I was thinking of a case locally, where because the owner belonged to such-and-such a club he was broken into. I think in this van Dam case, wityh the high likelyhood of a sexual motive for the potential crime, that the sexual life of the parents is pertinant and necessary, not only in investigation and grand jury, but also in defense during trial.

843 posted on 06/07/2002 9:16:41 AM PDT by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 837 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson