Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Felicity
Felicity, the dog stories have changed dramatically over time. Early in the case, from the van Dams' own lips, it was told that the dog "couldn't" bark. Later, it was told that the dog could bark, but not at all loudly, more like a whine or whimper. When they played that 911 tape at the trial, I also heard the dog barking, and another child in the background. It's just another of the many, many lies the van Dams have told from the beginning. I find it baffling. Tremendously baffling--their child is missing, and they can't tell the truth to help people find her?

Also on the subject of the tape, I have to tell you that Brenda did not sound frantic as is being portrayed in all the news stories. And I have something to use for comparison--other 911 calls made by mothers who've found their children gone. We do hear them fairly frequently.

And then there are the faked distress calls--we now know they were faked because later it comes out that the person calling either knew what had happened, or had done it herself, like Susan Smith.

We had a local case that is a perfect example: the woman called 911 reporting a "home invasion" where a "masked man" shot her in the hand and fatally wounded her husband. She did the same "Oh my God" in a flat voice as Brenda. Now, it comes out that she and one of her (many) lovers murdered her husband (why can't people just get a divorce?) and she and the lover (who fled to Mexico just before hubby's funeral) are standing trial for it.

Now, please note before flaming that these are my impressions of Brenda's "frantic" 911 call, and should not in any way be construed as fact unless and until evidence proves me right. (And it wouldn't surprise me in the least if it did.)

828 posted on 06/07/2002 7:09:05 AM PDT by MizSterious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 782 | View Replies ]


To: MizSterious
Thanks for your reply; yeah I too have noticed inconsistencies in the testimony of the Van Dams. The sad thing is that by distorting the truth, a reasonable doubt could be construed and if Westerfield is guilty he may not be convicted. This is what is so disturbing. Another One: During the Pre Lim, Brenda testified that Damon slept in underpants. Yesterday, she testified that he slept nude.
845 posted on 06/07/2002 9:27:05 AM PDT by Felicity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 828 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson