Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ~Kim4VRWC's~, all
I missed the after lunch stuff but one comment, the aerial photos appeared to me to be entered by the prosecution, thus they are prosecution exhibits and taxpayers paid for them.

Before the break Felman was asking Brenda about her phone being taped by the PD and about a call she received on I think 2/16... an objection was made then a sidebar..was this brought up again after lunch?

526 posted on 06/06/2002 3:05:10 PM PDT by rolling_stone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 521 | View Replies ]


To: rolling_stone
I didn't hear any more about the phone tap - but could only watch Court TV. What do you suppose that was all about? Why do you think it wasn't allowed - does Feldman just need to lay more groundwork first? I can't believe that if there was an incriminating statement on a phone tap - that it wouldn't be allowed to come out.
577 posted on 06/06/2002 3:59:50 PM PDT by mommya
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 526 | View Replies ]

To: rolling_stone
Before the break Felman was asking Brenda about her phone being taped by the PD and about a call she received on I think 2/16... an objection was made then a sidebar..was this brought up again after lunch?

Yes! What might Feldman be aware of?

It may not be admissible now, because there is no foundation for it. It may take the expert testimony of LE to describe the tap, before it can even be broached to the VD's.

But I don't think we've heard the last of it. JMO

579 posted on 06/06/2002 4:02:07 PM PDT by theirjustdue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 526 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson