Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Southflanknorthpawsis
I would have sent my ten-year-old son around to neighbor's homes too.

You would have let another child out of your sight at this point as an innocent parent??? HUMMMM, I find that super interesting.

410 posted on 06/06/2002 12:40:28 PM PDT by alisasny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 404 | View Replies ]


To: alisasny

Danielle's mother takes the stand


SIGNONSANDIEGO

June 5, 2002

Brenda van DamSAN DIEGO – A day after her husband, the mother of slain Danielle van Dam took the witness stand Thursday morning in the murder trial of David Westerfield.

Brenda van Dam broke down in tears several times during questioning that covered topics such as the length of Danielle's hair, her handful of encounters with the suspect and her discovery of Danielle's disappearance from her bedroom on Feb. 1.

"I have an emergency. My daughter's not in her bed this morning. She's only 7," Brenda van Dam is heard telling the dispatcher in an audiotape of her 911 call to police.

The dispatcher asks for more details, then assures van Dam: "Think positive thoughts and everything will be OK."

Cross-examined by lead defense attorney Steven Feldman, van Dam acknowledged that Danielle occasionally walked to other locations in the neighborhood and that Westerfield had parked his motorhome on the street for such long periods of time that she and others considered it an eyesore.

Danielle's hair and fingerprints were found in the motorhome after her disappearance, Dusek said in his opening statement on Tuesday. Feldman has argued that Danielle could have gotten into the motorhome on other occasions.

Brenda van Dam also acknowledged that she and friends drank and smoked marijuana at her home the night before Danielle disappeared, but she denied that she and her husband had ever hosted "sex parties" that could have let strangers become familiar with the layout of their house.

Disputed time of death

Brenda van Dam's testimony came after Feldman challenged the county medical examiner's estimate of when Danielle van Dam died.

Dr. Brian Blackbourne testified that he estimated Danielle had been dead for at least 10 days – and potentially up to six weeks – before her body was found.

"Just looking at the body, it was clear to me that she had been there for a considerable period of time," Blackbourne said, based on the degree of mummification and putrifaction of the body found off Dehesa Road on Feb. 27. Danielle disappeared Feb. 1.

But Feldman questioned Blackbourne's minimum 10-day estimate because the medical examiner had not checked weather reports to find out whether warm weather could have accelerated the decomposition process.

"To say that she was dead on the 17th of February, you would have to speculate, wouldn't you?" Feldman asked.

"Well, I have evidence on the body, so that's not really speculation," Blackbourne replied.

Insect evidence?

Blackbourne also acknowledged that forensic entomologist David K. Faulkner from the San Diego Natural History Museum had collected insects found on Danielle's body to help estimate the time of her death.

Feldman suggested more evidence would show Danielle hadn't been dead as long as Blackbourne had estimated, proving his client's innocence by showing that she had been killed and her body dumped in Dehesa while Westerfield was under surveillance by police.

Blackbourne was testifying on the third day of the murder trial of David Westerfield, the 50-year-old neighbor accused of kidnapping and killing Danielle.

Cause of death not established

Blackbourne testified Wednesday that no cause of death could be established because the body was so badly decomposed and ravaged by animals.

He said he ruled that the manner of her death was a homicide – as opposed to a suicide or natural causes – based on the position of her body, how far it was away from her home and the fact that searchers had been looking for her for three weeks.

Under cross-examination by Feldman, Blackbourne said that he couldn't find any signs of traumatic injuries.

Blackbourne also testified Thursday that decomposition prevent him from determining whether or not Danielle had been sexually assaulted before her death.

 


416 posted on 06/06/2002 12:46:21 PM PDT by FresnoDA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 410 | View Replies ]

To: alisasny
You would have let another child out of your sight at this point as an innocent parent??? HUMMMM, I find that super interesting.

Alisasny meet reality......

1. Sending a ten-year-old to nearby neighbors is not irresponsible.
2. Sincere panic rarely gives way to calculation.
3. This family leaves their children alone in public stores; even in dressing rooms.

Emergencies generally call for all the help one can find.

Try again. If you are frustrated and don't like the fact that the van Dams are looking bad here, take it out on someone else. I choose to look at EVERYONE with eyes wide open. Those seeking all of the truth should do the same.

A man's life is at stake. If found guilty, it better be after all other doubt and possibility has been eliminated.

424 posted on 06/06/2002 12:55:57 PM PDT by Southflanknorthpawsis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 410 | View Replies ]

To: alisasny
To: Southflanknorthpawsis

I would have sent my ten-year-old son around to neighbor's homes too.

You would have let another child out of your sight at this point as an innocent parent??? HUMMMM, I find that super interesting.

410 posted on 6/6/02 12:40 PM Pacific by alisasny

Above is your unsolicited post to me that insinuated that my feeling a 10-year-old could check at neighbor's was "super interesting".

You later made a further comment about sending him out in the middle of the night.

So......you asked to be set straight since you had no idea what you were talking about and you addressed me first with a total lack of understanding of the events I discussed.

Talk about "interesting"!!!!!!!!! Please do try to keep up.....especially if you are going to start a conversation with a critical remark. It backfired and apparently you can't even figure that out. Sheeeeeeeeesh !!!!!!!

466 posted on 06/06/2002 1:53:51 PM PDT by Southflanknorthpawsis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 410 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson