Amore, I never said they didn't do it,
I said it was a rumor started by a talk show host. I said I hope that the allegations prove to be untrue. I've said from day one that all I want to do is wait and see if the trial will prove the allegations true. Why does that mean I was defending them and why does that mean I was wrong? ALSO, it wasn't "our side" that said they've not denied it..it was the "other side" who said "why won't they admit or deny it ". When I said "why should they reply" that was a legitimate question..but wasn't a statement indicating their guilt or innocence. Can you imagine having to deal with not only the death of your daughter but all the publicity about your sex life?
OTOH, if it is proven that their grief was fake, I will admit being wrong.
Kim, they set out from DAY ONE, to deflect the focus off of themselves onto someone else. They deliberately withheld critical information, NOT out of fear their swinging would be exposed..remember "
We regret nothing", but because they knew the conditions in their home that evening would cast suspicion onto themselves or someone at their Swinging Pizza Party.
By the time the information was forced out of the van Dams, the focus onto someone else had already reached a feeding frenzy.
The only person who wasn't at the Party, who socialized with BVD at Dad's BAR, was DW...and he became the scapegoat. Just perfect.
sw