Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US backs further from peacekeeping (Bush keeps another promise,liberals upset)
Asia Times ^ | 6/6/02 | Jim Lobe

Posted on 06/05/2002 8:42:14 PM PDT by LarryLied

WASHINGTON - The administration of President George W Bush has decided to close the US Army's Peacekeeping Institute (PKI), the only US government agency of its kind, say Pentagon officials. The decision comes less than a month after Washington withdrew from the treaty to establish an International Criminal Court (ICC).

The PKI closure has not yet been formally announced. Officials said that the institute's functions would be reallocated to the Center for Army Lessons Learned (CALL) at Fort Leavenworth, Kansas. "How that transition will take place has yet to be worked out," said a PKI official at the Army War College in Carlisle, Pennsylvania, about 150 kilometers north of the US capital.

The PKI's dissolution is being described as part of an army reorganization made necessary by new budget allocations decreed by Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld. A number of knowledgeable individuals inside and outside the Pentagon dismissed that explanation, noting that Rumsfeld and his top civilian aides have long been hostile to US participation in peacekeeping.

"They're saying it's just a coincidence, but everyone knows that the PKI's budget is next to nothing and that abolishing it is another message from the boys at the top," said one military source who asked not to be identified.

The PKI, founded as the Cold War began to fade into memory in 1993, has a staff of 10 and an annual budget of US$200,000.

"This isn't about saving money," said Peter Gantz, project manager for United Nations peace operations at the World Federalist Association (WFA), which has worked closely with the uniformed military on peacekeeping. "This is drawing a line in the sand. The Bush administration is saying it wants the US out of peacekeeping in every way, shape or form," he added.

Robert Perito, a peacekeeping expert with the US Institute of Peace (USIP), a quasi-governmental think-tank, also regretted the decision to kill the PKI both because of how its closure will be interpreted abroad and at the UN and because of the institute's specific work.

"This sends a powerful signal," said Perito, who has overseen peace operations in Bosnia-Herzegovina, East Timor, and Kosovo. "The US has been criticized recently by a variety of sources about our unwillingness to take part in peace operations, so this only seems to substantiate that criticism."

As well as studying lessons learned in peace operations - it was created three months before the US peacekeeping debacle in Somalia that became the subject of the recent Hollywood blockbuster Blackhawk Down - the PKI also promoted US Army exchanges with international organizations, such as the UN, involved in peace operations. In addition, it hosted an annual meeting where all government offices involved in peacekeeping reviewed key developments and challenges in the field.

"This leaves a tremendous void in our ability to respond effectively to challenges that we will face in the years ahead," said Mike Dziedzic, a retired air force colonel who teaches at the National War College and worked as a strategic military planner with the UN mission in Kosovo. "The PKI's focus was directly relevant to the real security challenges, such as Afghanistan, the poster-child of failed states," said Dziedzic, now a senior fellow at USIP. "If we are successful in removing from power the leadership of the 'axis of evil', as in Afghanistan, we will still have to do something about creating good governance in those places, and that starts with peace operations."

During his presidential campaign, Bush said that he opposed US participation in peacekeeping because it reduced military readiness and morale. He thus echoed the initial skepticism of much of the uniformed military 10 years ago, when then president Bill Clinton pledged US troops to some peace operations.

This skepticism turned to support by the end of the 1990s as the military acquired more experience. Last March, the World Peace Through Law Education Fund concluded, on the basis of interviews with more than two dozen top US military leaders: "Most senior commanders believe that the US doesn't have to lead every operation but it has to be a player, and, to be most effective, must be a player on the ground." Among those interviewed was the commander of US operations in Afghanistan, army General Tommy Franks.

"The training that the young [non-commissioned officer] or younger officer gets [in Kosovo] is far superior to what he or she would be getting if they were [stationed at US bases] in Germany," said retired General Joseph Ralston, a former North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) commander

These conclusions have been rejected or ignored by Pentagon chief Rumsfeld, who favors a gradual withdrawal of US troops from peacekeeping duties in the Balkans and the Sinai.

The administration's opposition to participating in peace missions has only increased since the Rome Statute creating the ICC took effect in April. US diplomats at the United Nations reportedly have warned that Washington will not permit US troops to take part in any UN operation and may withdraw US personnel from current operations, notably East Timor, unless it receives guarantees that its nationals will not be subject to the ICC's jurisdiction.

The decision to abolish the PKI will not only reinforce international - and especially European - condemnation of US unilateralism, says Eric Schwartz, who dealt with peacekeeping as a senior staff member of the National Security Council under Clinton, but will discourage US military officers from working in this area.

In the absence of institutional recognition of the importance of peacekeeping, said Schwartz, now with USIP, it will not attract the most capable and most effective officers.

Added Dziedzic, "No one is going to line up with us unless we do it too."


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: unlist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-76 last
To: Schakaljager
Here we go again...the first person that can only find negatives no matter what happens. If Bush decapitated OBL himself and put his head on a pole in Washington, the Bush bashers would still say it was "too weak."
61 posted on 06/06/2002 2:49:32 PM PDT by rwfromkansas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Schakaljager
Oops....I just noticed you were talking about what OTHERS would say, not what you were saying. Sorry..lol.
62 posted on 06/06/2002 2:51:42 PM PDT by rwfromkansas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: rwfromkansas
bump
63 posted on 06/06/2002 2:55:33 PM PDT by rwfromkansas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: rwfromkansas
bump
64 posted on 06/06/2002 2:55:47 PM PDT by rwfromkansas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: rwfromkansas
bump
65 posted on 06/06/2002 2:56:02 PM PDT by rwfromkansas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: rwfromkansas
bump
66 posted on 06/06/2002 2:56:16 PM PDT by rwfromkansas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: rwfromkansas
bump
67 posted on 06/06/2002 2:56:31 PM PDT by rwfromkansas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: rwfromkansas
bump
68 posted on 06/06/2002 2:56:44 PM PDT by rwfromkansas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: rwfromkansas
bump again....
69 posted on 06/06/2002 2:56:59 PM PDT by rwfromkansas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: rwfromkansas
last bump so this thing at least gets 70.....
70 posted on 06/06/2002 2:57:19 PM PDT by rwfromkansas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: sabertooth
ping
71 posted on 06/06/2002 4:03:23 PM PDT by sarasmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: LarryLied
During his presidential campaign, Bush said that he opposed US participation in peacekeeping because it reduced military readiness and morale.

Bump!

72 posted on 06/07/2002 1:04:16 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: summer
Is it the preference of our people in the military to abolish peacekeeping missions?

From what I've seen on FR and conservative writers, yes. From those I know on active duty, I would say so. Even more important is getting rid of the PC nonsense. That drove many good people out during the Clinton years. We had 50 year old officers who had been married for 30 years having to take courses on sexual harassment. Pilots we spent millions training and who had spotless records and should have been doing their jobs were sitting in classrooms as if they were 14 year old boys being lectured on what is bad behavior.

73 posted on 06/07/2002 1:13:40 AM PDT by LarryLied
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: LarryLied
I hope this means we will begin withdrawing from the Balkans soon.
74 posted on 06/07/2002 1:17:47 AM PDT by Polonius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LarryLied
Thanks for your post above, Larry.
75 posted on 06/07/2002 3:50:54 PM PDT by summer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: LarryLied
I'm not used to the new format.I've been away a while.Thanks for the ping.

Have you seen the news in Ok?It's all been bad.

76 posted on 06/07/2002 9:01:38 PM PDT by karebare
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-76 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson