Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Tomalak
"And the scientists who consider Creationism to be scientific are outnumbered about 99 to 1."

Not surprizing. Still, the way evolution is defended makes me think they have something to fear in acknowleging that there's something bigger than they are. That's why I called them high priests in a post above. It's like some wierd ultra-sacrosanct religion, where all questions are answered by the magic word "evolution" and objectors are sent to the stocks.

49 posted on 06/05/2002 9:06:34 PM PDT by Washington_minuteman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]


To: Washington_minuteman
By this definition, evolution isn't science either

Wrong. Evolution can be falsified surprisingly easily. If even one fossil was found in the wrong place, we would know that evolution could not have taken place. Why do you think so many Creationists try to put fake fossils in these places except because they want to falsify the theory?

Still, the way evolution is defended makes me think they have something to fear in acknowleging that there's something bigger than they are.

Evolution does not exclude "something bigger". What it excludes is a literal interpretation of both of the two Creation stories in Genesis I-III.

52 posted on 06/05/2002 9:11:07 PM PDT by Tomalak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson