Anyone who says they want to get to the bottom of the story and learn the full truth, but also wants the VDs to be left uninvestigated is not honestly interested in the truth.
How any sensible person can quickly eliminate the many possibilities that come to mind with this swapping/swinging clan is beyond me.
Logic should have some role in all of this analysis.
The police said it had to be someone familiar with the house and the dog. Hmmmmmmmm..........that counts out DW.
That's just the beginning. There are so many aspects of this case that make it much easier to believe that one of the van Dam's lowlife buddies or the VDs themselves could have done this.
I hope the jurors don't think like some of the people on these threads. It seems like once DW was accused, that sealed his guilt in their minds; so much so, that they are completely blinded to all the other garbage swirling around this family and this home.
I think Westerfield was very familiar with the house and the dog. Westerfield lived in the neighborhood with a limited number of floor plans. Danielle had things on her bedroom door that indentified aa adolescent female. From what I remember Mom clued Westerfield into the alarm set up and the dog. I'd say he was familiar indeed.
Well, I think you'll agree that it depends here.
The comings and goings and ALL actvities of the people in and around that house should be investigated. You I think you and I know that the defense wants to deflect blame from Westerfield by getting the jury to condemn swinging (which I condemn) ... But if the other visitors to the house have been CLEARED, then the fact that the parents swing is a seperate issue than the fact that their daughter was murdered.