Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Damon Van Dam Takes Witness Stand: Day 2 of Westerfield Trial
KGTV 10 News-San Diego ^ | June 5, 2002 | KGTV

Posted on 06/05/2002 3:57:07 PM PDT by FresnoDA

Damon Van Dam Takes Witness Stand

Day 2 Of Westerfield Trial
Posted: 9:05 a.m. PDT June 5, 2002
Updated: 2:52 p.m. PDT June 5, 2002
SAN DIEGO -- The tearful father of murder victim Danielle van Dam admitted under oath Wednesday that he initially lied to police about a few events at his home that led up to her disappearance.

Damon van Dam, 36, said police asked him what had happened in the garage of his home that night when two friends of his wife, Brenda, arrived before a "girls night out" at Dad's Cafe in Poway.

The father testified that he initially didn't tell authorities that he had taken "a puff or two" from a marijuana cigarette the women were smoking.

"I didn't think it mattered and I didn't want to get in trouble for that," van Dam told prosecutor Jeff Dusek.

But van Dam said that after the officers told him they were only interested in finding his daughter, he began to be truthful with them.

He said he also did not tell police about one of his wife's girlfriends, Barbara Easton, coming into his bedroom that night after returning from the outing.

"When they told me it was absolutely critical to know what happened that night, I told them everything that happened that night," van Dam said.

He said Barbara was on the bed with him, above the covers, for about five minutes as Brenda first went to the bathroom, then downstairs.

"I kissed (Barbara), snuggled her some," van Dam said. "I think I put my arm around her and rubbed her back."

Damon van Dam

In his opening statement Tuesday, defense attorney Steven Feldman said that initial lies from the van Dams threw the police investigation off track.

Much of the morning testimony in the David Westerfield trial Wednesday was designed to orient jurors to the layout of the van Dam house, by using a floor plan and photographs.

Van Dam described the upstairs hallway that led to bedrooms, and also told the jury of six men and six women what was in Danielle's room. One of the issues in the case is whether artwork posted on the doors of the bedrooms would help someone know which room would be hers.

He added that each of the children's rooms had night lights, but Danielle's was burned out, so he opened the drapes to allow light from the street into the room.

Shown a photograph of his daughter's door, van Dam began to cry as he described why a dog gate had been placed there.

"I asked that the room not be cleaned," he finally explained.

Earlier today, Dr. Norman "Skip" Sperber, a forensic dentist, testified that four of Danielle's teeth were missing when he examined her mouth.

One eventually was found "way in the back of the mouth, where the gum meets the cheek," he said.

Under questioning by Deputy District Attorney Jeff Dusek, Sperber said it is not unusual for teeth to fall out during decomposition.

The child's body was found near some dumped trash and under a tree off a road in Dehesa in East County.

However, no teeth were found at the scene, Sperber said. He explained that animals, who sometimes carry away human remains, normally do not bother with teeth.

In opening statements, the prosecution said the loss of teeth showed that Danielle could have been suffocated.



TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: vandam; westerfield
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 301-316 next last
To: nycgal, hergus, HoHoeHeaux, fivecatsandadog, wonders, mommya, Hildy, vacrn, tutstar, ThinkingMan,
Ring-a-ding-a-ling
41 posted on 06/05/2002 4:43:22 PM PDT by Freedom2specul8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
Oh GAWD...can't we have a moment's piece?

sw

42 posted on 06/05/2002 4:44:56 PM PDT by spectre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

Comment #43 Removed by Moderator

To: daiuy
Please write a complete sentence with a subject, a verb, an object, and some context. Unlike you, I do not have the ability to discern meaning from a semi-random string of words.
44 posted on 06/05/2002 4:46:42 PM PDT by Poohbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: John Jamieson
Did you watch today?

I did not watch it but would love to. It is not televised in Los Angeles.

I think the parents are contemptable for their lifestyle which (I think) subjects the children to more risk than a "normal" family. I do not approve of the Van Dam's lifestyle and I think it harms their children. BUT, it is certainly possible (if not probable) that the parents were lowlifes and some creep (Westerfield) abducted their daughter, raped and strangled her. IF Westerfield was not a part of their "swinging" group, and even Westerfield does not say he swung with the Van Dams, then these are two seperate reprehesible incidents. Let's get Danielle's killer first.

45 posted on 06/05/2002 4:47:01 PM PDT by BunnySlippers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: spectre, ALL
HI SPEC!! :)

SUMMARY OF DAY 1....

46 posted on 06/05/2002 4:48:09 PM PDT by Freedom2specul8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah
I see you're just HOPING that the Van Dams are very directly involved in the murder. This case must give you a great deal of prurient entertainment and make your naughty parts tingle.

Now that was a creative come back.

47 posted on 06/05/2002 4:49:31 PM PDT by Freedom2specul8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

Comment #48 Removed by Moderator

To: bvw
The blood and hair -- by the GS cookie visit, or other days when Danielle may have entered the motorhome, possibly cut herslf. Murder has to be proved -- not just likely.

And if Westerfield is convicted I suppose you will be yelling that he "was framed". How about OJ ... a jury of almost all blacks didn't think he was guilty. How about you? I suspect you think OJ shoudl not have been convicted.

49 posted on 06/05/2002 4:51:42 PM PDT by BunnySlippers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: BunnySlippers
The parents may be slimeballs but the judge has said he will severely limit the defense's attempts to turn this into a trial about the parent's lifestyle.

Uh.......I think it's a little too late for that. My guess is that their lifestyle is about all the jurors and observers remember about today's trial.

50 posted on 06/05/2002 4:54:11 PM PDT by Southflanknorthpawsis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: BunnySlippers
Yes, I think OJ's son did it.
51 posted on 06/05/2002 4:56:02 PM PDT by John Jamieson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: FresnoDA
Sure was interesting when Feldman asked Damon whether Brenda was uncomfortable with Danielle around Barb...whether Brenda told DVD that she was uncomfortable with Barb being around Danielle.

Isn't this the same Barb that has had intercourse with Damon, in the presence of Brenda...

Noooo, she and her buddies shouldn't be suspects...

52 posted on 06/05/2002 4:56:44 PM PDT by demsux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: demsux
DW cell phone records
53 posted on 06/05/2002 4:58:59 PM PDT by Freedom2specul8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: demsux, valpal1, amore
from same link
18. "RE: Keep in mind...." R.R. reported from his sources that he was close to making a deal with the police-- specifically, he came close to telling them where the body was and then he decided he needed to talk to a lawyer first. I sure hope this will be allowed in court!
54 posted on 06/05/2002 4:59:58 PM PDT by Freedom2specul8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: demsux
I thought the it was interesting when DVD said something to the effect that a huge number of prople had at one time or another been in the house.
55 posted on 06/05/2002 5:00:37 PM PDT by John Jamieson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: John Jamieson
Yes, I think OJ's son did it.

Even though OJ's blood was on Nicole's front pathway and her blood was in his SUV? And a tabloid no less located a picture of OJ in Bruno Magli shoes which he said he never owned (this came up only in the civil trial). The evidence against OJ was overwhelming and none against his son.

56 posted on 06/05/2002 5:01:46 PM PDT by BunnySlippers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
They can track the ping from the nearest tower. Depends on what the range of each tower is. If it's 10 miles radius the tower will pick up the same ping no matter where your are. The cell phone was a warrant issue.

But no that's not explosive. Explosive was something said.

57 posted on 06/05/2002 5:03:55 PM PDT by Jaded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: spectre
What did we learn from this? We can assume that Damon made the story up, because he never put the child to bed or he would have closed the blinds.

Most excellent point !!!!!!

58 posted on 06/05/2002 5:04:05 PM PDT by Southflanknorthpawsis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: BunnySlippers
DNA of son very similar to father. No one looked very hard at son, who was known to be violent. More fun to get dad. And dad probably wanted it that way.
59 posted on 06/05/2002 5:04:06 PM PDT by John Jamieson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
If he said ANYTHING implying that he knew where the body was, and it's allowed in, Westerfield's doomed.
60 posted on 06/05/2002 5:04:48 PM PDT by Poohbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 301-316 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson