Posted on 06/05/2002 3:57:07 PM PDT by FresnoDA
Damon van Dam, 36, said police asked him what had happened in the garage of his home that night when two friends of his wife, Brenda, arrived before a "girls night out" at Dad's Cafe in Poway.
The father testified that he initially didn't tell authorities that he had taken "a puff or two" from a marijuana cigarette the women were smoking.
"I didn't think it mattered and I didn't want to get in trouble for that," van Dam told prosecutor Jeff Dusek.
But van Dam said that after the officers told him they were only interested in finding his daughter, he began to be truthful with them.
He said he also did not tell police about one of his wife's girlfriends, Barbara Easton, coming into his bedroom that night after returning from the outing.
"When they told me it was absolutely critical to know what happened that night, I told them everything that happened that night," van Dam said.
He said Barbara was on the bed with him, above the covers, for about five minutes as Brenda first went to the bathroom, then downstairs.
"I kissed (Barbara), snuggled her some," van Dam said. "I think I put my arm around her and rubbed her back."
In his opening statement Tuesday, defense attorney Steven Feldman said that initial lies from the van Dams threw the police investigation off track.
Much of the morning testimony in the David Westerfield trial Wednesday was designed to orient jurors to the layout of the van Dam house, by using a floor plan and photographs.
Van Dam described the upstairs hallway that led to bedrooms, and also told the jury of six men and six women what was in Danielle's room. One of the issues in the case is whether artwork posted on the doors of the bedrooms would help someone know which room would be hers.
He added that each of the children's rooms had night lights, but Danielle's was burned out, so he opened the drapes to allow light from the street into the room.
Shown a photograph of his daughter's door, van Dam began to cry as he described why a dog gate had been placed there.
"I asked that the room not be cleaned," he finally explained.
Earlier today, Dr. Norman "Skip" Sperber, a forensic dentist, testified that four of Danielle's teeth were missing when he examined her mouth.
One eventually was found "way in the back of the mouth, where the gum meets the cheek," he said.
Under questioning by Deputy District Attorney Jeff Dusek, Sperber said it is not unusual for teeth to fall out during decomposition.
The child's body was found near some dumped trash and under a tree off a road in Dehesa in East County.
However, no teeth were found at the scene, Sperber said. He explained that animals, who sometimes carry away human remains, normally do not bother with teeth.
In opening statements, the prosecution said the loss of teeth showed that Danielle could have been suffocated.
decided to do that and none of us deviated
It's just that unsavory people that are in close proximity to a crime should be looked at very closely. It seemed to not happen here and I am very bothered by it.
All other suspicions and doubts flow from that. It's not really complicated but may be why we don't see eye to eye on this case.
I agree that as they keep admitting their faults in public, on the stand... (what they're leaving out is anyone's gues) they make themselves look worse and worse. But they are parents of a murdered child and that title WILL carry with them forever. That title grants them the right to get angry, sarcastic, and every other motion they feel the need to express. As far as whether or not the parents did it, and whether or not the prosecution is just trying to get re-elected and whether or not the LE hate the hate the prosecutions enough to betray the memory of danielle to further their own cause, the bottom line IS the lifeless Danielle, and catching her killer.
It's nice to know that outsiders are all-knowing and all-seeing.
The reverse is also true. It doesn't seem that Westerfield's defenders are keeping an open mind as we see the TRUE evidence as it unfolds.
Earlier we were on the same wavelength and now you snipe.
Nevertheless, the parents are morally corrupt in my opinion (and I suspect yours as well), I want to see EVERYONE in this case investigated thoroughly (and I suspect you as well), but you appear not to be out to find the murderer necessarily but to grind a moral point into the ground about the parents lifestyle. I'd rather solely find Danielle's killer, whether it is a friend of the parents or Westerfield.
Hi guys....evidence is important..and what do we have against the vd's aside from consensual extra-marital sex, pot, booze and conflicting stories about embarrassing ''flings''? Before you all say anything this is NOT condoning their sick behaviour..
Thank you. I believe that YOU and a few others believe that..but do you care to take a poll on it?
How can you be so sure? Personel knowledge of something the rest of us don't know? Or just your own emotions?
Hmmm... Hergus, I might be missing something here, but I don't think that's what keeping an "open Mind" means. JMO.
Find the killer and convict. Quit the proselytizing, geez, we all know what DW's supporters think of the VD's. It is getting in the way of actual discussion of the case.
Well, I want to hear all the evidence as well. One supposedly will revise their opinion as they hear more evidence or evidence that refutes their previous opinion.
But I have noticed a marked propensity of people on Free Republic to revile people who develop an opinion as to who did it early on. That is a human trait to do so. Most of us talked for almost a year straight about who we think killed Nicole Simpson before hearing ALL of the evidence. Same with most people having an opinion as to what happened to Jon Benet Ramsey, or if the Menendez brothers really slaughtered their parents.
But their are moral folk here on Free Republic who just cannot accept that real people in the real world have opinions about whether Sam Shepard killed his wife, et al. This speculating is in essence, a parlor game, no more, no less.
I'm glad you said that because I believe there are a few who actually agree with you 100%
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.