Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Damon Van Dam Takes Witness Stand: Day 2 of Westerfield Trial
KGTV 10 News-San Diego ^ | June 5, 2002 | KGTV

Posted on 06/05/2002 3:57:07 PM PDT by FresnoDA

Damon Van Dam Takes Witness Stand

Day 2 Of Westerfield Trial
Posted: 9:05 a.m. PDT June 5, 2002
Updated: 2:52 p.m. PDT June 5, 2002
SAN DIEGO -- The tearful father of murder victim Danielle van Dam admitted under oath Wednesday that he initially lied to police about a few events at his home that led up to her disappearance.

Damon van Dam, 36, said police asked him what had happened in the garage of his home that night when two friends of his wife, Brenda, arrived before a "girls night out" at Dad's Cafe in Poway.

The father testified that he initially didn't tell authorities that he had taken "a puff or two" from a marijuana cigarette the women were smoking.

"I didn't think it mattered and I didn't want to get in trouble for that," van Dam told prosecutor Jeff Dusek.

But van Dam said that after the officers told him they were only interested in finding his daughter, he began to be truthful with them.

He said he also did not tell police about one of his wife's girlfriends, Barbara Easton, coming into his bedroom that night after returning from the outing.

"When they told me it was absolutely critical to know what happened that night, I told them everything that happened that night," van Dam said.

He said Barbara was on the bed with him, above the covers, for about five minutes as Brenda first went to the bathroom, then downstairs.

"I kissed (Barbara), snuggled her some," van Dam said. "I think I put my arm around her and rubbed her back."

Damon van Dam

In his opening statement Tuesday, defense attorney Steven Feldman said that initial lies from the van Dams threw the police investigation off track.

Much of the morning testimony in the David Westerfield trial Wednesday was designed to orient jurors to the layout of the van Dam house, by using a floor plan and photographs.

Van Dam described the upstairs hallway that led to bedrooms, and also told the jury of six men and six women what was in Danielle's room. One of the issues in the case is whether artwork posted on the doors of the bedrooms would help someone know which room would be hers.

He added that each of the children's rooms had night lights, but Danielle's was burned out, so he opened the drapes to allow light from the street into the room.

Shown a photograph of his daughter's door, van Dam began to cry as he described why a dog gate had been placed there.

"I asked that the room not be cleaned," he finally explained.

Earlier today, Dr. Norman "Skip" Sperber, a forensic dentist, testified that four of Danielle's teeth were missing when he examined her mouth.

One eventually was found "way in the back of the mouth, where the gum meets the cheek," he said.

Under questioning by Deputy District Attorney Jeff Dusek, Sperber said it is not unusual for teeth to fall out during decomposition.

The child's body was found near some dumped trash and under a tree off a road in Dehesa in East County.

However, no teeth were found at the scene, Sperber said. He explained that animals, who sometimes carry away human remains, normally do not bother with teeth.

In opening statements, the prosecution said the loss of teeth showed that Danielle could have been suffocated.



TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: vandam; westerfield
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 301-316 next last
To: theirjustdue
decided to that and none of us deviated

decided to do that and none of us deviated

141 posted on 06/05/2002 7:09:32 PM PDT by Freedom2specul8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: FresnoDA
Thanks for the ping.
142 posted on 06/05/2002 7:14:04 PM PDT by hergus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: alisasny
What do you think she was killed for......money?
143 posted on 06/05/2002 7:15:07 PM PDT by John Jamieson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: BunnySlippers
I'm glad to see you posting today Bunny, I remember you from past VD threads as one of the few people who had an opinion close to mine. Gee, I wish you'd post more! :- )
144 posted on 06/05/2002 7:17:20 PM PDT by Amore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: BunnySlippers
It's not really about morality, although I do have a problem with that.

It's just that unsavory people that are in close proximity to a crime should be looked at very closely. It seemed to not happen here and I am very bothered by it.

All other suspicions and doubts flow from that. It's not really complicated but may be why we don't see eye to eye on this case.

145 posted on 06/05/2002 7:17:52 PM PDT by Southflanknorthpawsis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: BunnySlippers
While I have posted here since the beginning about this case I have made it clear that the parents are scum ... but it is apparent that there are some here who quite obviously rather hang the parents for the (relatively) lesser CRIME of swinging rather than probe forensic and real evidence for the crime of MURDER. Amazing!

I agree that as they keep admitting their faults in public, on the stand... (what they're leaving out is anyone's gues) they make themselves look worse and worse. But they are parents of a murdered child and that title WILL carry with them forever. That title grants them the right to get angry, sarcastic, and every other motion they feel the need to express. As far as whether or not the parents did it, and whether or not the prosecution is just trying to get re-elected and whether or not the LE hate the hate the prosecutions enough to betray the memory of danielle to further their own cause, the bottom line IS the lifeless Danielle, and catching her killer.

146 posted on 06/05/2002 7:18:40 PM PDT by Freedom2specul8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: fnord
Really? How so? Based on evidence he is only guilty of living nearby. Got more to add to that? You should be paying attention. If the evidence starts to add up against DW, then we will know. Until then some folks are just fishin'.

It's nice to know that outsiders are all-knowing and all-seeing.

147 posted on 06/05/2002 7:18:50 PM PDT by Poohbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]

To: Politicalmom
Unless you are God, you can't say "The parents didn't do it." YOU don't know.

The reverse is also true. It doesn't seem that Westerfield's defenders are keeping an open mind as we see the TRUE evidence as it unfolds.

148 posted on 06/05/2002 7:22:29 PM PDT by hergus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: BunnySlippers
Please don't missrepresent my (our?) point of view. We are not trying the DVs for the crime of swinging, we are trying to figure out if the swinging might point to other suspects. No need to discuss this case at all, if it's a forgone conclusion that DW did it. I'm not there, yet.
149 posted on 06/05/2002 7:23:49 PM PDT by John Jamieson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: Southflanknorthpawsis
It's just that unsavory people that are in close proximity to a crime should be looked at very closely. It seemed to not happen here and I am very bothered by it.

Earlier we were on the same wavelength and now you snipe.

Nevertheless, the parents are morally corrupt in my opinion (and I suspect yours as well), I want to see EVERYONE in this case investigated thoroughly (and I suspect you as well), but you appear not to be out to find the murderer necessarily but to grind a moral point into the ground about the parents lifestyle. I'd rather solely find Danielle's killer, whether it is a friend of the parents or Westerfield.

150 posted on 06/05/2002 7:24:41 PM PDT by BunnySlippers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies]

To: fnord, Poohbah
I know it's all about sex to some people here, and they get quite a tingle from that (no offense), but evidence is important to others ...

Hi guys....evidence is important..and what do we have against the vd's aside from consensual extra-marital sex, pot, booze and conflicting stories about embarrassing ''flings''? Before you all say anything this is NOT condoning their sick behaviour..

151 posted on 06/05/2002 7:26:05 PM PDT by Freedom2specul8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]

To: John Jamieson
Please don't missrepresent my (our?) point of view. We are not trying the DVs for the crime of swinging, we are trying to figure out if the swinging might point to other suspects. No need to discuss this case at all, if it's a forgone conclusion that DW did it. I'm not there, yet.

Thank you. I believe that YOU and a few others believe that..but do you care to take a poll on it?

152 posted on 06/05/2002 7:27:29 PM PDT by Freedom2specul8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies]

To: alisasny
"it was NOT her parents"

How can you be so sure? Personel knowledge of something the rest of us don't know? Or just your own emotions?

153 posted on 06/05/2002 7:28:48 PM PDT by John Jamieson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: hergus
The reverse is also true. It doesn't seem that Westerfield's defenders are keeping an open mind as we see the TRUE evidence as it unfolds.

Hmmm... Hergus, I might be missing something here, but I don't think that's what keeping an "open Mind" means. JMO.

154 posted on 06/05/2002 7:29:01 PM PDT by theirjustdue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies]

To: BunnySlippers
Exactly!!Great post!

Find the killer and convict. Quit the proselytizing, geez, we all know what DW's supporters think of the VD's. It is getting in the way of actual discussion of the case.

155 posted on 06/05/2002 7:30:41 PM PDT by hergus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies]

To: John Jamieson
No need to discuss this case at all, if it's a forgone conclusion that DW did it. I'm not there, yet.

Well, I want to hear all the evidence as well. One supposedly will revise their opinion as they hear more evidence or evidence that refutes their previous opinion.

But I have noticed a marked propensity of people on Free Republic to revile people who develop an opinion as to who did it early on. That is a human trait to do so. Most of us talked for almost a year straight about who we think killed Nicole Simpson before hearing ALL of the evidence. Same with most people having an opinion as to what happened to Jon Benet Ramsey, or if the Menendez brothers really slaughtered their parents.

But their are moral folk here on Free Republic who just cannot accept that real people in the real world have opinions about whether Sam Shepard killed his wife, et al. This speculating is in essence, a parlor game, no more, no less.

156 posted on 06/05/2002 7:30:57 PM PDT by BunnySlippers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies]

To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
Sure....Poll away. At this point I'd make DW the number one probabilty, DVs (together) number 2 and others sexually accociated with VD's number 3 and total strangers number 4.
157 posted on 06/05/2002 7:31:54 PM PDT by John Jamieson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies]

To: theirjustdue
Maybe early senility has hit me once again, what does keeping an open mind mean?
158 posted on 06/05/2002 7:33:20 PM PDT by hergus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]

To: John Jamieson
Great! you forgot #5..not sure yet

I'm glad you said that because I believe there are a few who actually agree with you 100%

159 posted on 06/05/2002 7:35:37 PM PDT by Freedom2specul8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies]

To: theirjustdue
Well clearly I AM missing something. What about her statement does not demonstrate an open mind?
160 posted on 06/05/2002 7:36:19 PM PDT by Amore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 301-316 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson