My conclusion about the Bushbasherbots on FR: They are either 1) ignorant of how an idea becomes legislation and how legislation becomes law, 2) ignorant of the scope and responsibility of the judicial system, 3) not practical enough to truly get anything they want accomplished, 4) i.e., ignorant of how politics and government really work, and/or 5) simply dislike George W. Bush for some reason which escapes me. I think it's mostly #5, because their attacks on Bush are not simply discussion points, but points filled with venom. I don't get it.
I don't agree with 100% of what Bush has done, and I wish he'd do things that he hasn't taken on (yet). But I don't lose any sleep over these things. If I agree with Bush more times than not, I'm satisfied. It beats having whatever the alternative might be.
And speaking of alternatives, who do the Bushbasherbots offer up as an alternative? Pat Buchanan?