No, excuse me! I DID conclude that is what you meant, because that is what you said. I take people's words literally. I take what they say seriously. If that is not what you meant, you should have been more careful how you articulated what you meant. It seemed to me that your whole point was based on the notion that the Solicitor General was "re-writing" the Constitution based on an opinion he expressed to the Court. Minus this, I don't know what your point was.
I don't even LOOK at those threads [the anti-Lincoln threads]. I've seen some of the comments. It's enough to make a person sick.
My2Cents, striking a blow for free speech on "Free" Republic!
No overabundance of gray matter crowding your skull, is there...