Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Texaggie79
For what?

Well, for being drawn in by the old, lame foes he should know for what they are: The Washington Post, the NY Times and Drudge.

For letting his disappointment over what he considers Bush's failures make him an embittered ranter, no longer fun to listen to.

For pouncing as eagerly on any rumor, leak or slant about a Bush mistake as he ever did on anything about the Clinton's.

For not checking, trusting, waiting to see, but just jumping on Bush with both big feet.

That's some of the what.

87 posted on 06/05/2002 11:30:10 AM PDT by altura
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]


To: altura
For not checking, trusting, waiting to see, but just jumping on Bush with both big feet.

That's what he did to X42 and it catipulted him to the top.

Unfortunately, with Prez. Bubba it was usually true and with President Bush it is likely not true.

If the ratings slip, Rush will change. He always has before (like when he spent so much time talking about cigars) and he will again. He is an entertainer, not a pundit, and not an employee of the GOP.

Shalom.

184 posted on 06/05/2002 12:26:52 PM PDT by ArGee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson