Replies

I agree with you. I think where I disagree is the idea that anyone who disagrees with the President on any issue is a "far right winger, embittered by their loss in the primary."

I am not a far right winger, and I am a Bush supporter. I just happen to think that Rush's criticism on the global warming debacle, while typically overboard in its character, was accurate.

I was not going to stop supporting the President before he distanced himself from the report, and I am not certainly going to stop supporting him now. Yet, just because I refuse to join in on the attacks on Rush as a unpatriotic neo-liberal/neo-right-winger, I have been virulently attacked in this very thread. I think everyone, on all sides of this debate, needs to take a breath and collect their wits.

I am not going to repeat my comments about the environmental stuff...they are there in other threads, and after all, I don't want to BORE anyone like Sunshine Sister with repetition.

My objection is not to disagreement. It is to the personal, hateful manner in which the disagreement was raised, and the way it was conducted in this forum.

Rush is the only political source for a lot of people. Instead of taking a reasoned, calm approach to this issue, he attacked the President personally. Of what value is that?