Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rush: "..Going FReeper on me"
Rush Limbaugh Radio Show ^ | 6-5-02 | Rush Limbaugh

Posted on 06/05/2002 10:41:16 AM PDT by Matchett-PI

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 341-360361-380381-400 ... 501-507 next last
To: Sabertooth
"In science there's a burden of proof, and the global warming crowd hasn't met an ounce of it." I agree with your analysis.

The main point I was trying to make there is that there is no reason to deny that the earth is and has been warming. There is no reason to deny that hydrocarbons are released into the atmosphere by the fruits of the industrial revolution. But those facts do not justify Kyoto or any other regulatory regime restricting use of hydrocarbons.

361 posted on 06/05/2002 4:09:13 PM PDT by colorado tanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 350 | View Replies]

To: Mudboy Slim
...my facetious Will Rogers' impression...

I gottcha Mud..... 8^) Eyes wide open.

362 posted on 06/05/2002 4:09:31 PM PDT by Reagan Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 355 | View Replies]

To: Matchett-PI
They misspelled bathroom.
363 posted on 06/05/2002 4:09:42 PM PDT by savedbygrace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sweetliberty
Lighten up. I don't say that to be insulting, just to suggest that maybe we ALL have more important things to be focused on.

I hate to agree with you, but most folks here seem to have lost all sense of proportion. Bush may or may not have marginally changed his previous positions on global warming. Rush may or may not have been too critical of the President. Come on people. GET A GRIP.

Are you acting like this because we are all waiting for some real news, and do not have anything worth fighting about?

364 posted on 06/05/2002 4:11:23 PM PDT by Lucius Cornelius Sulla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 356 | View Replies]

To: Lucius Cornelius Sulla
You're scaring me! You mean we actually agree on something? LOL!
365 posted on 06/05/2002 4:13:35 PM PDT by sweetliberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 364 | View Replies]

To: Ken H
"I had assumed wrongly that top Administration officials would view the premise that human activity is likely mostly to blame, as junk science. You assumed correctly, don't believe the spin.
366 posted on 06/05/2002 4:14:17 PM PDT by colorado tanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 360 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man
My co worker claims that Rush disavowed the Republican Party today, said his allegiance was never to the Republican Party ,but to his own principles. He also reiterated why he supported Pat Buchanan over GB41,in the primaries. If true,Rush has confirmed today, what many of us suspected the last few months, that he has left the party of Lincoln and Reagan and GW.Can anyone confirm this? If true, I should think that Drudge would have a flashing red light declaring, " Rush Limbaugh leaves the Republican Party"!!!
367 posted on 06/05/2002 4:15:17 PM PDT by Wild Irish Rogue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 357 | View Replies]

To: Lucius Cornelius Sulla
Are you acting like this because we are all waiting for some real news, and do not have anything worth fighting about?

I don't like your name... Too many letters.




368 posted on 06/05/2002 4:21:50 PM PDT by Sabertooth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 364 | View Replies]

To: Texaggie79
I don't define conservative, by looking at a person who is called conservative and seeing what it is that he believes. I define conservative with the Constitution, liberty.

Well, that's a difference between us. I live in the world of 21st century reality and understand the history that has gotten us, where we are today, as a nation. I also don't associate modern conservatism, strictly with Constitutional principles. Before we can return America to a more traditional form of government, in line with the intentions of the Founding Fathers, we must work within the political system, to make the changes necessary, to reach the goal of a smaller and less intrusive federal government. Conservatism believes in incremental steps, because conservatives understand the slow process of politics.

You tlak more like a constitutionalist and not a conservative. If you want to get America, back to a strict form of constitutional government, in a hurry, that requires a revolution.

369 posted on 06/05/2002 4:25:15 PM PDT by Reagan Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 358 | View Replies]

To: colorado tanker
There is no reason to deny that hydrocarbons are released into the atmosphere by the fruits of the industrial revolution.

As well as by rotting fruit.

We need to make this simple and get the debate off the turf and target of the Left, which is precisely the industrial revolution.




370 posted on 06/05/2002 4:26:08 PM PDT by Sabertooth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 361 | View Replies]

To: quidnunc
"Well he accomplished a $600 tax rebate for me and my wife and that's more than your guy (whoever that may be) would have delivered."

The $600 dollar muffler Dubya bought you has been more than off set by the social benefits which are soaked up daily by the hoards of illegals who break into America each day.

Why in NYC alone, the "children" are taught in more than 60 different languages.

Only a full blown putz would fail to see the relationship between open borders and increased social spending paid for by Joe and Jane Six Pack.

Did Lucy show you the door?

371 posted on 06/05/2002 4:27:02 PM PDT by Jethro Tull
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 326 | View Replies]

To: anniegetyourgun
"Rush throwing FR an bone. Truth is he thinks everyone on FR is a nutbag."

How do you know this????? Are you a member of the Psychic Friends Network?

372 posted on 06/05/2002 4:29:23 PM PDT by albee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man
we must work within the political system, to make the changes necessary

I agree, but surely you cannot believe that we can get closer by venturing even farther away from it......

373 posted on 06/05/2002 4:30:46 PM PDT by Texaggie79
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 369 | View Replies]

To: Wild Irish Rogue
I heard Rush today, he made some remarks about supporting Buchanan back in 1992, but I don't recall what else he said.

If everyone isn't aware, Rush has said on a few occasions in the past, that he received a letter from Ronald Reagan, back in the early 1990`s. Rush claimed, in that letter, that Reagan passed onto Rush, the mantle of conservative leader. If that's the case, I don't think Rush will ever leave the Republican Party. But I said the same about brother Buchanan too and was very disappointed by Pat's disloyal behavior.

374 posted on 06/05/2002 4:34:03 PM PDT by Reagan Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 367 | View Replies]

To: colorado tanker
There is no liberal spin on the fact that the Administration is accepting the premise that human activity is likely mostly responsible for global warming.

My assumption that they would not accept this premise remains mistaken.

375 posted on 06/05/2002 4:34:05 PM PDT by Ken H
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 366 | View Replies]

To: Sabertooth
I guess I disagree concerning tactics. Conservatives just look silly claiming the earth isn't warming or that cars don't release hydrocarbons.

You are correct that the Left's target is the industrial revolution. Why not put that right upfront and let people know that global warming is an effort by extreme environmentalists and liberals to dismantle chunks of our economy for no good reason?

And I see no reason why President Bush shouldn't call out the Europeans for getting Clinton into a sucker deal with Kyoto. By using 1990 as the benchmark date the Europeans put the compliance burden on the US because most of our improvement on C02 came before 1990 and most of theirs came after. Then the Europeans struck a deal with the third world mostly to exempt them from compliance if they'd back the European plan to stick it to North America and Japan. Why not expose this rotton nonsense for what it is instead of arguing science issues?

376 posted on 06/05/2002 4:38:03 PM PDT by colorado tanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 370 | View Replies]

To: Wild Irish Rogue
" It compounds their pain, to hear Rush claim that the man who ordered their son into battle,may as well have been Al Gore"

Oh come on. You're comparing peanuts and cabbage. Somehow I really don't think that those people are thinking much one way or the other about Bush's environmental policy. One issue doesn not carryover to the other.

377 posted on 06/05/2002 4:39:28 PM PDT by sweetliberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 195 | View Replies]

To: sweetliberty
You mean we actually agree on something?

At least when we flame each other, we are arguing about something worth fighting about! This thread is a waste of good freeping time.

378 posted on 06/05/2002 4:40:55 PM PDT by Lucius Cornelius Sulla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 365 | View Replies]

To: Sabertooth
I don't like your name... Too many letters.

And yours is too short, and you don't even animate your graphic. GRRRRRRR! Now I am getting mad! LOL!

379 posted on 06/05/2002 4:43:53 PM PDT by Lucius Cornelius Sulla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 368 | View Replies]

To: Texaggie79
I agree, but surely you cannot believe that we can get closer by venturing even farther away from it......

Of course not. I didn't support the education bill, 245i, the farm welfare bill and CFR, but I can see the politics employed behind those moves, by Bush and Rove. Let's face it, we've got serious political gridlock in Wash-DC. It started 20 years ago with the election of Reagan and doesn't seem to be turning around. I don't know how you can have endless accomplishments under this state of political stalemate.

380 posted on 06/05/2002 4:43:59 PM PDT by Reagan Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 373 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 341-360361-380381-400 ... 501-507 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson