Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Texasforever
Some of your points are well taken. Though it is still early in GW's administration to fairly compare and contrast his and RR's accomplishments...

However, some of Dubya's national security policies seriously lacking. For some of the so-called "Bush-bashers", as with Rush, our only sin is in disagreeing with ANY policy position Dubya has taken.

Is that really a good thing?

180 posted on 06/05/2002 12:04:20 AM PDT by F16Fighter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 170 | View Replies ]


To: F16Fighter
However, some of Dubya's national security policies seriously lacking. For some of the so-called "Bush-bashers", as with Rush, our only sin is in disagreeing with ANY policy position Dubya has taken.

No, there are many of us that would join in the constructive criticism IF, at least in my case, the rants going on around here were not so damned outrageously incorrect and over the top that they cannot be left unchallenged. Rush in particular went off on the so-called U-turn based on a Drudge report of a NYT story that bore NO relationship to the facts in any respect.

182 posted on 06/05/2002 12:13:16 AM PDT by Texasforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 180 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson