I'll repeat myself, just this once...
I *quoted from the report itself*. The thing that is causing all this uproar. My beliefs stem from what it said in its *first paragraph*, which, as I said, I quoted straight from the report.
So, #404 does not contradict me, it contradicts the report itself. If the author of that post wants to argue with those who wrote the report, then that's fine with me. I don't care.
For myself, I choose to doubt that a report would lie about something so basic in the first paragraph of an introduction which is all that most people will read of it (it is a long report).
Why don't you just go and read the Introduction, then you can cut and paste from it and tell us all how it is lying.
Tuor
Yes, and you interpreted it incorrectly. You jumped to conclusions. Now I direct you to #451. Is this a religious thing with you or will enough evidence convince you?