Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: gramho12
Ok.

So Bush is not responsible for his own administraion, it's Clinton's fault.

Does that apply when something good happens too, or only something bad?

Rush may have over-reacted, sure. But Bush now has a strategy of waffling, of good-cop, bad-cop, of throwing morsels at left, right and center in hopes of placating everyone. It's hard for me to trust anyone who does that.

I hope the anti-Kyoto position Bush has taken will last. But I'm not exactly comforted by the fact that either Bush cannot control his own agencies until after the fact, or that he wants to play both sides of every issue.

If some Bush supporters want to celebrate a damage control statement that still leaves plenty of wiggle room, have at it. I'm disappointed it has to come to that. Guess that makes me a "frothing lunatic" for not trusting government further than I can throw them.
390 posted on 06/04/2002 11:39:01 AM PDT by over3Owithabrain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 341 | View Replies ]


To: over3Owithabrain
Hm-m-m. I never said it was Clinton's fault, just that Bush and his administration have been ham-stringed the first year with delays and a little thing called war. How did you get there from my comments?
539 posted on 06/04/2002 12:51:42 PM PDT by gramho12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 390 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson