I still believe that this whole thing was long in the works and the administration had a choice: (1) Try to undermine and change it, running the risk of vocal defections by some of the scientists. (2) Downplay and dismiss it.
I can see why #2 is a good option. I'd hate to hear the NY Times articles of the "supressing" of the report, etc.
"The bureaucracy" -- bwahahaha.
22 posted on 06/04/2002 10:13:19 AM PDT by AmishDude