I didn't mean to suggest that he did. But I remember reading at least one post yesterday where someone was saying Bush has better info than we have and he must be making the right decision. It was pretty much following him blindly. I'm sure there were others out there that thought the same thing.
I have to admit the thought jumped in my head for about 1 nanosecond before I told myself it was BS.
Man, you ARE fast, aren't you? :-)
Regarding the post about "Bush having a lot better information than we do," yeah, I see a lot of stuff like that on here; I also see a lot of "other" people acting like they have inside information. Take it all with a grain of salt.
Personally, I cannot imagine how any one man could know everything. Hell, I don't even know what's going on downstairs at my house right this minute!
I read that post also. You're mischaracterizing what the lady said. She simply was keeping an open mind. She stated up until now she had not closely followed the global warming debate, but that she was going to look into it. She conceded that, since she had not followed that issue, that perhaps there was something to it, but that she would have to do some research before coming to any kind of conclusion. Someone also mentioned that it would be a good idea for both sides to look at global warming scientifically rather than ideologically.
Sounds reasonable to me.