Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: hurlburt
So you deny that you changed your answer to the question: did the EPA report contradict GWB previous views and the conservative agenda? C'mon let's have it. Let's go down this road and finish it.

That list of statements disguised as questions? You had compound entities in that little attempt a obfuscation, you mentioned the conservative "agenda" and then Bush It was not worth arguing with you about. Here is a little education for you. There is NO honest scientist on either side that has stated that global warming is not real or that humans have categorically NOT had and impact. Any scientist conservative or liberal that stated such are not scientists they are political hacks with an agenda. The distinction made on the doubters side has always been and still is that there is NOT enough evidence to warrant the monumental costs to fix a problem that has not been validated. That is what the report stated and that is Bush and many in the conservative scientific community still believe. Now, if that is not enough "answer" to your foot stomping, breath holding tantrum then so be it. I could give a rip.

1,005 posted on 06/04/2002 11:00:04 PM PDT by Texasforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1002 | View Replies ]


To: Texasforever
It's a mad house!
1,007 posted on 06/04/2002 11:03:34 PM PDT by Joe Hadenuf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1005 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson