Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Poohbah
Well, if you're claiming that secession was some sort of legal right, then you are forced to recognize the Union's property rights.

I am? Was the property for the Fort was given to the federal government - or was it purchased by the federal government? (Hint: it was NOT purchased by the federal government).

From Article I, section 8, clause 17: [T]o exercise like Authority over all Places purchased by the Consent of the Legislature of the State in which the Same shall be, for the Erection of Forts, Magazines, Arsenals, dock-Yards, and other needful Buildings."

In Federalist 43, Madison explains that it's "public money expended on such places". Public money (eg, federal monies) did not purchase the land in consideration. It also had to be done with the consent of the state legislature, and we all know that legislative acts are subject to rescission (no prohibition against that either).

131 posted on 06/04/2002 7:55:32 PM PDT by 4CJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies ]


To: 4ConservativeJustices
I am? Was the property for the Fort was given to the federal government - or was it purchased by the federal government? (Hint: it was NOT purchased by the federal government).

Since it was an artificial island, it REALLY belonged to the Federal Government--they built the damn thing in the first place. And other facilities that the Confederates had chased the Federal government out of had been secured in fee simple.

So, which one is it?

132 posted on 06/04/2002 7:58:35 PM PDT by Poohbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson