Go back and read the posts. That is what YOU are debating. Not me. My debate is about the principle whether or not a Catholic can reject an Encyclical and/or Catholic Doctrine. It isn't argueable. He can't.
If he does, and Scalia does, he is just another tray-pusher in the Catholic Cafeteria standing in line with Frances Quisling, the SSPX, McBrien (and sinkspur). Sure, he will select other "options" than do the others; but he is a Cafeteria Catholic just like the rest of them