To: Pokey78
I think this argument is a crock. Dubya has folded again. Get used to it, the folds are getting more frequent.
6 posted on
06/03/2002 11:12:48 PM PDT by
edger
To: edger
He folded. You can't put a square into a round hole and I think Andrew Sullivan's attempt to make it sound inconsequential falls flat. Sullivan should stop embarrassing himself for it makes him look like an apologist for the party line. Besides we conservatives don't stoop to personality worship. For me at least, principles matter more than who happens to be in the White House.
To: edger
I'm sure you do think it's a crock. It doesn't "fit" your agenda, does it?
13 posted on
06/03/2002 11:20:39 PM PDT by
Howlin
To: edger
No, you just want something to bash Bush about. Sullivan is correct, but you don't give a damn about facts !
To: edger
How has he folded if his policy is to do nothing !
The earht is warming and it's a fact but why is the question?
"That Rush would follow, based on what he states was an article on the front page of Monday's New York Times, is discouraging."
Rush is quoting the NY Times alot lately and basing what they say as fact. He's being played like a fiddle by the left and so are many here on FR! If it makes your case fine but don't get a hard on too fast because it won't last long.... !
To: edger
I think this argument is a crock. Dubya has folded again. Get used to it, the folds are getting more frequent. I think Dubya wants to give everyting to everybody, and you just cannot do that.
To: edger
I think this argument is a crock. Dubya has folded again.
You were going to think this way no matter what. You're not fooling anyone.
90 posted on
06/04/2002 6:09:47 AM PDT by
rdb3
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson