Skip to comments.
Universe is a computer
Nature ^
| 3 June 2002
| Phillip Ball
Posted on 06/03/2002 10:42:37 PM PDT by sourcery
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-47 last
To: sourcery
Is this why we all face the blue screen of death after our 3 score and 10??? parsy.
41
posted on
06/18/2002 5:20:56 PM PDT
by
parsifal
To: tortoise
I don't know that there is any memory requirement for optical virtual images. Aren't they constantly created and when the light goes out they are gone only to reappear instantly when the light returns? Only the original object is permanent, and there is just one of those.
To: RightWhale
I don't know that there is any memory requirement for optical virtual images. Aren't they constantly created and when the light goes out they are gone only to reappear instantly when the light returns? Only the original object is permanent, and there is just one of those. I guess it depends on how you look at it. Yes, the photons just bounce back and forth between the mirrors, but that isn't really the point I was trying to make. You can only make the parallel mirror reflections by applying more resources longer to the problem than the image itself requires. If you look at the universe as a computer, there is no way to do it without using extra computing resources.
Of course, there is a more important fundamental problem: parallel mirrors can't make infinite reflections, even in the theoretical. Why? Because there are only two possible photon trajectories from an object placed between the parallel mirrors. First, photons that do not have a trajectory perfectly perpendicular to the mirror will reflect elsewhere. Photons that do have a vector perfectly perpendicular to the mirror will be reflect back into the object that created/reflected the photon in the first place i.e. the image you placed in between the mirrors. The "infinite mirror" effect is only possible to observe if the mirrors are slightly off-axis, at which point the reflections are no longer infinite.
43
posted on
06/18/2002 5:41:07 PM PDT
by
tortoise
To: tortoise
They are using parallel mirrors to trap photons and wave packets. It seems to be true that there aren't an infinite number of virtual images in parallel or nearly parallel mirrors, so it looks there wasn't a serious problem to begin with. Besides, the reflected images get smaller as the number of reflections increase, so this is probably a finite sum of an infinite series problem.
To: tortoise
If the universe is a computer, are we characters in someone's holodeck? Can we be turned off if no one's on the holodeck watching us? And the ultimate question? WHO is watching us and who is programming the computer inside which we live? I feel like the Professor Moriarity character in the Star Trek: The Next Generation "Ship In A Bottle" episode and wonder if we can ever truly leave and see where we are.
Comment #46 Removed by Moderator
To: weikel
damn that skynet!!!
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-47 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson