[northernwilson]

The stupid policy ended up slowing down terrorism, destroyying the infrastructure, and reminding the Palestinians that htey cannot use terrorism as a negotiating tactic.

I agree that Arafat was using the bombers as a negotiating tactic, he no doubt saw it as the only leverage he had to gain concessions. I no more cared for Arafat's tactics than I do for Sharon's overly brutal response. The extremists on both sides seem to be winning, and that doesn't bode well for any chance of peace over there anytime soon.

[BuckeyeForever]

We are in complete agreement.

[KLT]

[rmlew]

I agree that Arafat was using the bombers as a negotiating tactic, he no doubt saw it as the only leverage he had to gain concessions. I no more cared for Arafat's tactics than I do for Sharon's overly brutal response. The extremists on both sides seem to be winning, and that doesn't bode well for any chance of peace over there anytime soon.

Sharon's response was quite tame. Troops, not bombs were used. Infact, it was incomplete. He did not send troops into Gaza. Sharon's position is hardly extreme and was supported by the Labour party.

[Stavka2]

That's a crock of shiete. Arafat was offered just about everything....the terrorists are his only leverage for the extermination of the Isrealies Jews...and the Palistinian Christians. This is the same man who has the blood of 100,000 Lebanese Christians on his hands. Lets not forget that.