I saw this tidal change of using left wing maggot opeds in January of 2000 before GW became president. Some of the so called conservatives were running hit articles from the NY Slimes, DC Compost and LA Slimes and using them as clubs to bash GW just like with this phoney article. A lot of conservative sites got un bookmarked at that time. If I want the left wing Bravo Sierra from these left wing fishwraps, I will go directly to the trash no need for second hand passing of it by Rush Klimbaugh or Sean Klannity.
Actually, I think all of this is really good. We now know that the KKKKKKer Klassless Klowns will not help us with this fall's elections anymore than the other Bush haters. In a shootout it, it is good to know where your enemies are before the shooting starts. That way you never turn your back to them. Those who think that this election is not serious for us, have been inhaling or sniffing too much of something. You will not deter us from what is important. We will defeat the rats in the senate without your help, nor do we need your help.
We will unseat enough rats in the Senate to really upset the Bush haters. It will be a long and hard 6+ years for the Bush haters. Irrelevance is an awful thing in life and politics. You guys had better buy a lot ice and Vaseline. Then maybe get group rates with your favorite shrinks.
This article is like the Bravo Sierra articles to fire Mr Mueller because he didn't stop 9/11.
The reality that the Bush haters can't face is a simple one. Mueller was not appointed as FBI Director until 9/4/2001. The NY Slimes and the usual left wing media maggots were just trying to protect the real guilty ones, the bent one and his man/it Jake Reno. Amazing the so called conservatives who hate GW jumped right on that one and demanded that Mueller be fired as he had been so wrong for a whole week.
Again I will restate a simple rule of life: If you are a real conservative, you would never use an unchecked out oped by the NY Slimes, Washington Compost or LA Slimes. The minute you cite one of the Bravo Sierra opeds, you have as much credibility as a three time loser saying, he was innocent!
Rush Klimbaugh and Sean Klannity just ate a whole bunch of NY Slimes Bravo Sierra and thought that it tasted good. They have lost even more credibility with the ones who will not be deterred this November when we defeat a lot of Rat senators.
I guess what confuses me is how quickly those of you who so passionately defend Bush turn on those, who were one-time allies and denounce them with every name you can muster. Sounds like you are guilty of the same rush-to-judgment, "hater" mentality.
It tells me that, Clinton-like, you'll denounce me the instant I disagree with the man of the hour. I've noticed on this thread that every single time someone even questions Bush's agenda, they are attacked as a "whiner" and "disloyal" and on and on it goes. People who are committed to limited government, a constitutionally bound judiciary, and who are staunchly pro-life are considered no better than the mindless leftists.
Something seems wrong with this picture.
As a conservative military member, I didn't care for Bush (as a politician) before he won the primary, after the election (although I voted for him), and now. I'm not being inconsistent; I have never felt comfortable with his "new tone" approach. I still consider myself very much a conservative and can't fathom why disagreeing with Bush = traitor.
I do agree with what has been said by paying attention to who the source is that we get much of the news from, but at the end of the day, I don't think folks should burn in the Pit for criticizing Bush.
Personally, I'm left to wonder at a "strategery" that leaves a great deal of your base annoyed (at best confused or in a "wait and see" posture) and your enemies emboldened. Whatever happened to simply telling the truth boldly and consistently? To taking the fight right to the enemy in the way of speeches? Whatever happened to courage of convictions? Why are folks on this thread left to surmise and argue among themselves what is meant by this or that move by the administration? Is there anything wrong with longing for a day when you have a leader who will clue you in??
LOL. You show very convincingly that all it takes for good conservatives like Rush and Sean (who support Bush) to get smeared by Bush-Bots like you is to have the audacity to disagree with the Bush Administration on something. Sorry Sir, it's you that have no credibility. You prove it every time you post.
Wow, what did I do to you? I did like Bush, enough to vote for him, and argued for him to many of my liberal associates I work with. However, when my liberal associates come in and are praising Bush for what he's doing, there might be an issue or two I need to revisit and look at again. It's not just this article, it's a lot of what he has done in office.
What? I can't be a Constitutionalist Conservative if I don't back Bush? What am I then? I'm not libertarian, at least I don't think I am. I'm sure as heck not liberal. But apparently if I don't fall in line and in step with current Bush supporters, I'm labeled as the worst scum of the earth imaginable. Are we supposed to stop thinking when 'our' candidate gets into office and let him run ramshod over every liberty and guideline the Founding Fathers held dear?