...me neither buddie. You are right on about bush. he has betrayed his base with this, along with several other other "semi-betrayals."
It's a lot like how Clinton dodged by saying he was "not having SEX with that woman." Denying the subtle betrayals daily coming from the "pseudo conservative Bush party" requires that bushbot conservatives twist reality by redefining the narrowist possible terms, the meaning of the word "betray."
Bushbot Conservatives have taken to parsing "betrayal" in very narrow terms, so they won't have to admit our boy sold us out, to some degree on every agreement and decision he has made. There is not one PURE and CLEAR embracement he has made that FULLY repudiates in entirety the liberal "a prioris" we all despise.
WE are way past the point where "consensus building" has become "idealogical compromise."
It calls to question a whole plethora of recent accusations we have been hearing... Did Bush/Ashcroft KNOW that 9-11 was actually going to occur and did NOTHING about it, though they could have?
Six months ago I rejected all this stuff as outright slander... now, I am beginning to wonder. Who stands to gain by compromise and lying about what was known and when?
Just look at the popularity he is enjoying... and the soccermommies who are so hot for him...
It makes me sick to think, but things are really not good are they? These kind of discussions and REALITIES would NOT even exist, if things were right and good in our nation.
The darkest of times may lie ahead. Bush is not, what he appeared to be. It appears once again, that apples do not fall far, from the tree.
Sheesh you all take the NYT as your "Bible" now? Like I stated before it looks like the media has found their "useful idiots" and they are on the rabid right.
Six months ago I rejected all this stuff as outright slander... now, I am beginning to wonder. Who stands to gain by compromise and lying about what was known and when?
A truly Tom Daschle statement if I have ever heard one.