Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: LoneGOPinCT
What’s Bush up to?

1. The US was obligated to prepare and submit the report.

2. It’s a great argument for nuke power.

See below from National Review’s The Corner.

OVERHEATED TIMES TWO [Jonathan Adler]

A front-page New York Times story claims that the U.S. government has officially acknowledged the coming greenhouse apocalypse. Last week, the administration submitted the 2002 Climate Action Report to the United Nations. This report summarizes recent national and international syntheses of climate science, and describes some of the "likely" and "possible" impacts of increased emissions of greenhouse gases and resulting climate changes.

As is to be expected from any document produced by the Environmental Protection Agency and Department of State, the report accentuates the negative. (For a more balanced presentation of the science see here and here.) At the same time, however, the report time and again reiterates the uncertainty of climate science. The Times nonetheless opens its story by claiming the report "detail[s] specific and far-reaching effects that it says global warming will inflict on the American environment." Not quite. The report outlines some specific potential scenarios, but it carefully states all of its predictions in probabilistic terms and reiterates the National Academy of Sciences' conclusion that specific predictions about climate change are, as yet, impossible. More importantly, the report notes (and the Times acknowledges) that global warming is likely to increase agricultural and forest productivity and that insofar as some climate change is inevitable, current policies should embrace adaptive measures, not crash energy diets. There's no need to wait to see how the report will be spun. The Times was ready this morning with an editorial calling for congressional action to regulate greenhouse gases. No doubt Senator Jeffords will do his best to oblige.

OVERHEATED TIMES TWO

45 posted on 06/03/2002 10:26:12 AM PDT by The Kid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]


To: The Kid
We're wasting our time; if they had wanted to read it, they would have. Lord knows, it all over this site.
47 posted on 06/03/2002 10:26:53 AM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

To: The Kid
The report outlines some specific potential scenarios, but it carefully states all of its predictions in probabilistic terms and reiterates the National Academy of Sciences' conclusion that specific predictions about climate change are, as yet, impossible. More importantly, the report notes (and the Times acknowledges) that global warming is likely to increase agricultural and forest productivity...

[snort!] It'll take a hell of a lot of "global warming" to return Greenland to the idyllic farming country the Vikings found and settled! >:p

I note that many of the so-called scientists now screaming about global warming were, when I was in high school, issuing dire warnings of a new Ice Age by 2025! All of the global warming models are bullshit. Not one of them can "predict" the documented past! Taken in either direction, they all run off into catastrophic climate changes. They are bullshit, and the scientists who support them are spouting bullshit because that's what gets them all that nice grant money. The New Ice Age is out of political favor! Long live Global Warming, the new favorite!

1,107 posted on 06/04/2002 5:48:26 AM PDT by Silverdrake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson