[hchutch]

Gee, the New York Times had the part about no change in policy. To me, that is the important thing. And the report had so many qualifications in its admission, that I don't see what the fuss is about.

[rdb3]

Gee, the New York Times had the part about no change in policy.

When I read this portion of the article, I stopped reading. If there's no change in policy, what's the use in getting upset? Nothing changed.