Replies

The entire report has been up on the EPA website for over a week. It wasn't until today that the NYT took bits and pieces from it to fit their view which isn't what the article represents at all. Drudge and Rush just chose to sensationalize it rather than going the extra mile to understand it themselves choosing to go the NYT view which is incorrect.

Karl Rove didn't have anything at all to do with this...

I didn't say he did, and again, this report in a vaccuum is no big deal.. The point is, how much is Bush willing to sacrifice in order to win? I honestly can't say with any amount of certainty that Bush would remain pro-life. If a politically sensitive bill was in the senate like Campaign finance in relation to abortion, I can pretty much guarentee Bush would side and take up the Democrat view point to some degree. The point isn't this report, the point is his entire agenda is based on taking up democratic issues before democrats make issues out of them. And to that end, what is the point of having a republican in the white house if all he is going to do is forward the Democratic agenda?